Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 20;118(2):357–368. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcw109

Table 3.

Species differences in root traits measured under non-limiting water conditions

Nassella pulchra Koelaria macrantha Elymus glaucus Elymus elymoides Festuca idahoensis Melica californica Poa secunda Poa bulbosa
RTD (g cm–3) 0·27 ± 0·05ab 0·34 ± 0·04a 0·16 ± 0·02b 0·22 ± 0·02ab 0·23 ± 0·03ab 0·22 ± 0·03ab 0·3 ± 0·04ab 0·28 ± 0·03a
RLD (cm cm–3) 2·24 ± 1·04abc 7·94 ± 2·14a 3·12 ± 0·84ab 0·77 ± 0·21c 2·23 ± 0·74abc 1·55 ± 0·51bc 9·98 ± 3·3a 1·06 ± 0·25bc
RDMC (mg g–1) 227·74 ± 28·6abc 185·61 ± 13·46ab 208·25 ± 15·1abc 198·44 ± 14·39abc 193·27 ± 17·16abc 164·55 ± 14·61a 268·93 ± 23·88bc 262·81 ± 16·5c
SRL (m g–1) 88·67 ± 16·75a 118·47 ± 12·92a 116·73 ± 12·73a 77·16 ± 8·42a 98·84 ± 13·21a 112·44 ± 15·02a 337·41 ± 45·08b 359·77 ± 33·99b
Max depth (cm) 70 ± 15·86ab 69·8 ± 6·46a 48·12 ± 4·88abc 46·96 ± 4·34abc 43·42 ± 4·02bcd 34·85 ± 5·58bcd 28·89 ± 2·67d 30·84 ± 3·12cd
95 % depth (cm) 72·05 ± 7·87a 45·44 ± 4·54abc 48·72 ± 4·54abc 52·02 ± 4·54ab 31·09 ± 5·57bc 35·48 ± 5·57bc 25 ± 5·57c 38·28 ± 3·94bc
Very fine roots (%) 81·27 ± 4·19ab 77·78 ± 2·42a 51·47 ± 2·42cd 48·01 ± 2·42c 58·59 ± 2·97cd 62·03 ± 2·97d 95·72 ± 2·97b 96·59 ± 2·1b
Average diameter (mm) 0·19 ± 0·02abcd 0·17 ± 0·01ab 0·25 ± 0·01c 0·26 ± 0·01c 0·22 ± 0·01ac 0·21 ± 0·01ac 0·12 ± 0·01bd 0·12 ± 0·01d
Root:shoot dry mass 0·33 ± 0·03a 0·12 ± 0·03b 0·14 ± 0·03bc 0·1 ± 0·04b 0·16 ± 0·04bc 0·29 ± 0·04ac 0·02 ± 0·03b
Emaxroot (cm d–1) 1·15 ± 0·16a 0·79 ± 0·09ab 0·64 ± 0·09ab 0·76 ± 0·09ab 0·56 ± 0·11ab 0·81 ± 0·11ab 0·39 ± 0·11b 0·95 ± 0·08a

Values are marginal means ± s.e.

Letters indicate significant differences as determined by Tukey’s post-hoc tests (P < 0·05).

RTD, root tissue density; RDMC, root dry matter content; SRL, specific root length; SRA, specific root area; Emaxroo, maximum root elongation rate.