Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 2;11(8):e0159965. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159965

Table 2. Results of RCTs comparing aminophylline to β2 adrenergic agonist.

Author, sample size Loading (mg/kg) Infusion (mg/kg/h) Resolution of symptoms Intubation Discharge criteria Actual Discharge Adverse effects
Wheeler 2005 [25] n = 40 (Am n = 13, β2 n = 16, both n = 11) 6.4 0.64 to 0.96 Time to reach CAS ≤3 24.2±12.1h vs 51.6±33.3h p<0.05 No patients required mechanical ventilation Not measured Not reported NS in the median number of adverse effects, higher incidence of nausea in combined group
Roberts 2003 [34] n = 44 (Am n = 26 β2 n = 18) 5 0.9 Change in ASS over 2 hours -1.19±1.3 vs -1.11±1.7 p = 0.85 1/26 vs 2/18 in salbutamol p>0.05 Not measured Time to discharge in aminophylline vs. salbutamol 57.3h±43.3 vs. 85.4h±56.0 p = 0.02 Adverse effects In aminophylline group vs. salbutamol 22.2% vs. 36% p = 0.50
Singhi 2011 [35] n = 100 (Am n = 33, β2 n = 33, MgSO4 n = 34) 5 0.9 number of participants with improvement in CAS at 1h ≥4 am, ter, 5 vs. 5 p = 0.002 Not reported Not measured Not reported None in Mg group, 2 patients in terbutaline group had hypokalaemia and 9 in am group had nausea/vomiting
Hambleton 1979 [27] n = 18 4 0.6 Change in asthma score at 24 hours 4.5 vs 4.0 in p>0.05 Not reported Not reported Not reported Higher rates of tachycardia in salbutamol group

Am aminophylline, β2 beta 2 agonist, ASS asthma severity score, MgSO4 magnesium sulphate CAS/PI clinical asthma score/pulmonary index. Sizes of intervention vs. control groups were not reported in Hambleton 1979