Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug;11(4):637–650.

Table 3.

Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool

Paper Sequence generation Allocation concealment Blinding Incomplete data Selective outcome reporting Other validity threats
Anderson et al41 L Randomly assigned to orthosis test condition U No indication of allocation concealment process U No indication of blinding process for participants or assessors U The study did not address this outcome L Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes H Males and females did not complete the same protocol, flaw in study design
Bousie et al39 L Randomly assigned to orthosis test condition U No indication of allocation concealment process U No indication of blinding process for participants or assessors U The study did not address this outcome L Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes L The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
Boyd et al23 L Randomly assigned to pedal test condition U No indication of allocation concealment process U No indication of blinding process for participants or assessors U The study did not address this outcome L Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes L The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
Cruz et al42 H No random allocation to pedal test condition U No indication of allocation concealment process U No indication of blinding process for participants or assessors U The study did not address this outcome L Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes, although with limited methodology and data analysis details L The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
Dinsdale et al58 L Randomly assigned to insole test condition U No indication of allocation concealment process U No indication of blinding process for participants or assessors U The study did not address this outcome L Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes L The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
Gregersen et al9 L Randomly assigned to pedal test condition U No indication of allocation concealment process U No indication of blinding process for participants or assessors U The study did not address this outcome L Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes L The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
Hennig et al40 H No random allocation to shoe test condition U No indication of allocation concealment process U No indication of blinding process for participants or assessors U The study did not address this outcome -1 Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes L The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
Jorge et al59 H No random allocation to shoe test condition U No indication of allocation concealment process U No indication of blinding process for participants or assessors U The study did not address this outcome L Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes L The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
Koch et al56 L Randomly assigned to orthoses test condition L Participants were blinded to the allocation L Participants were blinded to the group allocation U The study did not address this outcome L Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes L The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
O’Neill et al15 H No random allocation to orthoses test condition U No indication of allocation concealment process U No indication of blinding process for participants or assessors U The study did not address this outcome L Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes L The study appears to be free of other sources of bias
Sanderson et al31 L Randomly assigned to pedal test condition U No indication of allocation concealment process U No indication of blinding process for participants or assessors U The study did not address this outcome L Protocol is available and reports include expected outcomes L The study appears to be free of other sources of bias

L = Low bias risk, U = Unclear bias risk, H = High bias risk