Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Magn Reson Med. 2016 Feb 2;77(2):855–863. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26131

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

Pearson’s correlation analysis results (n = 11). (a) T1w versus water content. (b) APT# signal intensities versus T1w/[water proton]. (c) NOE# signal intensities versus T1w/[water proton]. (d) MTRasym signal intensities versus T1w/[water proton]. The black lines indicate the linear regression of all ROI values. The Pearson’s correlation coefficients (r) and p values were calculated in each correlation graph.