Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 2;5(1):1226. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2876-z

Table 3.

Comparison of the proposed method with existing methods for the UCF sports dataset

Methods Accuracy (%)
3SMF + STIP + NBNN 94.39
Wang et al. (2009) 85.60
Yan and Luo (2012) 90.67
Le et al. (2011) 86.50
Shao et al. (2014) 93.4
Zhang et al. (2015) 88.0

Italic value mean the best results