Table 3.

Overview of the intercorrelations between generation fluency and creative quality of the options, familiarity and valence of the situation, and performances in the cognitive test battery.

	Mean self-rated familiarity	Mean self-rated pleasantness	Mean divergence of options	Mean originality of options	Maximum originality of options	Mean feasibility of options	Mean number of options	Mean generation onset time
RAT correct answers	0.00	-0.31	0.17	0.06	0.04	-0.03	-0.07	-0.23
Number of product labels	0.14	0.00	0.19	0.39∗	0.10	-0.12	-0.11	-0.11
Letter fluency with one letter	-0.07	0.02	0.13	-0.24	0.10	0.05	0.24	-0.27
Letter fluency with two letters	0.03	-0.19	0.26	0.00	0.10	-0.11	0.29∗	-0.32∗
Cost of change in letter fluency	-0.14	0.24	-0.12	-0.33∗	0.04	0.20	0.00	0.00
Category fluency with one category	-0.03	0.16	0.11	-0.02	0.32	-0.23	0.34∗	-0.19
Category fluency with two categories	-0.07	0.20	0.19	-0.09	0.23	-0.10	0.32∗	-0.19
Cost of change in category fluency	0.04	0.06	0.00	0.04	0.29	-0.21	0.19	-0.01
Cost of numerical set shifting	-0.02	-0.24	-0.27	-0.13	-0.10	0.09	-0.16	0.13
LTM performance after interference	-0.04	0.16	0.12	0.10	0.25	-0.10	0.28∗	-0.17
LTM performance after delay	-0.02	0.05	0.07	0.04	0.17	-0.05	0.27	-0.14
LTM loss through interference	0.00	-0.09	-0.25	-0.25	-0.31	0.20	-0.32∗	0.23
LTM loss through delay	-0.03	0.07	-0.18	-0.15	-0.17	0.13	-0.29∗	0.19

Bolded values in the table indicate statistical significance at p < 0.01.^∗p < 0.01.