Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 3;7:1087. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01087

Table 2.

Comparison of distribution of attachment classifications in our sample and a non-clinical European sample (Bakermans-Kranenburg and Van IJzendoorn, 2009).

Attachment classification Sample hypertension absolute frequency Exact confidence interval CI-95% (%) Sample hypertension relative frequency (%) Sample Europe relative frequency (%) p-values
Secure (F) 5 [4–25] 12 52 <0.001***
Insecure (Ds, E, U) 38 [75–96] 88 48 <0.001***
Dismissing (Ds) 7 [7–31] 16 25 0.220
Preoccupied (E) 18 [27–58] 42 11 <0.001***
Unresolved trauma (U) 13 [17–44] 30 12 0.001**
Total 43 [100] 100 100 <0.001***

Significances were calculated by two-sided exact binomial test and in line “total” with exact multinomial test.

**

p<0.01;

***

p<0.001.