Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 3;7:1209. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01209

Table 5.

Summary of current and possible alternative pathways as applied to whole phage and phage derived therapeutics.

“Classical” licensing Adaptive licensing Compassionate use
Advantages • “Gold” Standard
• Already established for antibacterial drugs
• Would be suitable for phage derived products
• Additional legislation being introduced to streamline procedures for antibacterial drugs
• Limited population approvals
• Iterative process which can inform future work
• Can be adapted for pre and custom phage cocktails
• Immediate clinical usage
• Data could be used to inform future work
• Could be utilized for all forms of phage therapy
Disadvantages • Recruitment for trials
• Cost
• Reformulation would require additional trials
• Varying degrees of complexity
• Limited population approvals
• Limited to a single patient basis
• Not actually approved for use
Other considerations • Likely that only highly defined products would be able to succeed, limiting success • Approval of predefined libraries would require wholly new approvals process • Lack of public awareness of phages
Time to implementa ++ ++ or +++* +
Cost to implementa $$$ $$ or $$$* $
a

Assumption has been made that “Classical” licensing is a baseline.

*

Both cost and time to implementation would be affected by the form of treatment chosen. Pre-approved libraries taking longer and costing more to achieve.