Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug;5(4):405–415. doi: 10.21037/gs.2016.07.01

Table 5. Comparison between patients with and without flap complications (n=158).

Selected variable No flap complications (n=108) With complications (n=50) P value
Age (years): mean ± SD 42.6±6.9 45.7±8.4 0.016
BMI (kg/m2): mean ± SD 22.4±3.1 23.4±3.6 0.068
Type of TRAM flaps: n [%] 0.911
   Ipsilateral unilateral 90 [83] 40 [80]
   Contralateral unilateral 9 [8] 4 [8]
   Bipedicled unilateral 3 [3] 2 [4]
   Bipedicled bilateral 6 [6] 4 [8]
Donor site complications: n [%] 0.007
   None 91 [84] 42 [84]
   Wound infection or dehiscence 3 [3] 7 [14]
   Umbilicus necrosis 3 [3] 1 [2]
   Seroma 11 [10] 0 [0]
Chemotherapy: n [%] 0.331
   None 31 [29] 14 [28]
   Neoadjuvant 3 [3] 4 [8]
   Adjuvant 74 [69] 32 [64]
Radiotherapy: n [%] 30 [28] 13 [26] 0.815
High volume surgeon: n [%] 69 [64] 30 [60] 0.638

TRAM, transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index.