Table 1.
General characteristics of the included articles (n = 19)
| Tool’s name | Version | Author, year of publication | Study type |
|---|---|---|---|
| OPTION scale | Revised-scale of OPTION | Kasper, 2012 [43] | Specific psychometric properties (criterion validity) |
| MAPPIN’SDM | Kasper, 2012 [43] | New instrument | |
| SDM’MASS (meeting its concept’s assumptions) | Geiger, 2012 [37] | New instrument | |
| German version of the OPTION scale | Hirsch, 2012 [45] | Transcultural validation in german language | |
| OPTION scale | Nicolai, 2012 [46] | New psychometric properties | |
| Modified-OPTION scale | Keller, 2013 [47] | Specific psychometric properties (criterion validity, ICC, sensitivity analysis) | |
| SDM-Q-9 | SDM-Q-Doc | Schöll, 2012 [34] | New instrument |
| SDM-Q-9 | Kriston, 2010 [42] | Instrument previously identified in Scholl’s review | |
| SDM-Q-9 | De Las Cuevas, 2014 [50] | Transcultural validation in spanish language | |
| Decisional Conflict Scale | DCS | Kawaguchi, 2013 [44] | Transcultural validation in japanese language |
| DCS-LL (low literacy version) | Linder, 2011 [51] | Transcultural validation in low literacy version | |
| IDM (Informed decision making) instrument | Leader, 2012 [36] | New instrument | |
| CICAA-Patient Centered | CICAA-D | Ruiz Moral, 2010 [38] | New instrument |
| Dyadic measure of SDM | Légaré, 2012 [33] | New instrument | |
| CollaboRATE | Barr, 2014 [39] | New instrument | |
| SURE | Ferron Parayre, 2014 [48] | Specific psychometric properties (criterion validity, sensitivity analysis) | |
| I-PICS | Jonsdottir, 2013 [49] | Transcultural validation in icelandic language | |
| SDM scale | Singh, 2010 [40] | Instrument previously identified in Scholl’s review | |
| DAS-O | Brown, 2011 [41] | Instrument previously identified in Scholl’s review |