Skip to main content
. 2016 Jan 6;4(4):587–594. doi: 10.1177/2050640615624294

Table 10.

Relationship between site, screening status and stage.

RS
RI
RNP
LS
LI
LNP
NoSCS
NoSCI
NoSCNS
ReS
ReI
ReNP
% (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n) % (n)
A 25.2 (39) 9.7 (19) 8.8 (29) 37.7 (79) 17.7 (21) 12.1 (28) 38.8 (7) 8.3 (2) 12.0 (6) 36.4 (63) 32.1 (52) 13.2 (41)
B 41.3 (64) 29.4 (58) 29.8 (99) 21.1 (44) 29.4 (35) 29.6 (68) 16.7 (3) 25.0 (6) 14.0 (7) 17.9 (31) 17.8 (29) 19.0 (59)
C 27.1 (42) 31.5 (62) 32.2 (107) 22 (46) 31.1 (37) 26.1 (60) 27.8 (5) 29.2 (7) 18.0 (9) 27.2 (47) 22.8 (37) 30.4 (94)
D 4.5 (7) 22.8 (45) 20.8 (69) 9.1 (19) 16.8 (20) 22.6 (52) 29.2 (7) 42.0 (21) 5.2 (9) 14.3 (23) 18.4 (57)
UK 1.9 (3) 6.6 (13) 8.4 (28) 10.1 (21) 5.0 (6) 9.6 (22) 16.7 (3) 8.3 (2) 14.0 (7) 13.3 (23) 13.0 (21) 19.0 (59)
Total 155 197 332 209 119 230 18 24 50 173 162 310

LI: left colon interval; LNP: left colon non-participant; LS: left colon screen-detected; NoSCI: not otherwise specified colon interval; NoSCNP: not otherwise specified colon non-participant; NoSCS: not otherwise specified colon screen detected; ReI: rectal interval; ReNP: rectal non-participant; ReS: rectal screen-detected; RI: right colon interval; RNP: right colon non-participant; RS: right colon screen-detected.

RS vs RI: χ2 = 40.62, p < 0.0001; LS vs LI: χ2 = 20.88, p = 0.0003; NoSCS vs NoSCI: χ2 = 10.67, p = 0.0305; ReS vs ReI: χ2 = 8.173, p = 0.0854.

RI vs RNP: χ2 = 0.92, p = 0.9215; LI vs LNP: χ2 = 5.66, p = 0.2260; NoSCI vs NoSCNP: χ2 = 3.39, p = 0.4951; ReI vs ReNP: χ2 = 24.87, p = 0.0001.

RS vs RNP: χ2 = 50.41, p < 0.0001; LS vs LNP: χ2 = 45.76, p < 0.0001; NoSCS vs NoSCNP: χ2 = 13.31, p = 0.0099; ReS vs ReNP: χ2 = 44.46, p < 0.0001.