Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Dec 31;63(1):130–135. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13191

Table 3.

Concurrent and Convergent Validity of the Pittsburgh Fatigability Scale Physical Fatigability Score with Performance Fatigability, Mobility, Physical Function, and Fitness

Performance Measure Adjusted Physical Fatigability Score Mean (Standard Error)a Adjusted Mean Difference P-Value Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (95% Confidence Interval)
Yes No
High perceived exertion (n = 123, 27%)b 18.3 (1.7) 13.2 (1.5) 5.1 <.001 0.73 (0.68–0.79)
High performance deterioration (n = 82, 18.1%)c 17.3 (1.8) 14.2 (1.6) 3.1 <.001 0.68 (0.61–0.74)
Slow gait speed (n = 101, 21.9%)d 17.3 (1.7) 13.8 (1.6) 3.5 <.001 0.76 (0.68–0.84)
Worse physical function (n = 111, 25%)e 16.6 (1.7) 13.3 (1.6) 3.2 <.001 0.67 (0.61–0.73)
Lower fitness (n = 117, 25%)f 17.4 (1.6) 12.3 (1.6) 5.1 <.001 0.74 (0.69–0.80)
a

Adjusted for age, sex, and race.

b

Defined as rating of perceived exertion ≥10 at the end of 5-minute treadmill walk at 0.67 m/s.

c

Defined as ≥6.5% slower lap time between Laps 9 and 2 from the long-distance corridor walk.

d

Usual gait-speed <1.0 m/s from fastest of two 6-m walks.

e

Highest quartile (>13.58 s) of time to complete five chair stands.

f

Highest quartile (≥307.1 s) of time to complete fast-paced 400-m walk.