Table 3.
Results obtained for the evaluation dataset with the five commercial solutions [WFB (Mirada Medical), MIM (MIM Software), SPICE (Philips), ABAS (Elekta), and RS (RayStation)] compared to expert delineation for the rectum.
| WFB | MIM | ABAS | SPICE | RS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 0.87 ± 0.19 | 1.27 ± 0.28 | 1.27 ± 0.38 | 1.30 ± 0.34 | 1.08 ± 0.28 |
| DSC mean | 0.73 ± 0.07 | 0.75 ± 0.07 | 0.75 ± 0.09 | 0.68 ± 0.12 | 0.49 ± 0.12 |
| DSC median | 0.76 | 0.77 | 0.75 | 0.73 | 0.51 |
| H95% (mm) | 10.0 ± 3.0 | 9.9 ± 3.4 | 9.9 ± 4.4 | 13.0 ± 4.9 | 16.5 ± 3.7 |
R is the volume ration, DSC is the dice similarity coefficient, and H95% is the Hausdorff distance.