Table 4.
Results obtained for the evaluation dataset with the five commercial solutions [WFB (Mirada Medical), MIM (MIM Software), SPICE (Philips), ABAS (Elekta), and RS (RayStation)] compared to expert delineation for the prostate bed CTV.
| WFB | MIM | ABAS | SPICE | RS | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R | 0.53 ± 0.11 | 1.37 ± 0.35 | 1.04 ± 0.13 | 0.49 ± 0.15 | 0.82 ± 0.12 |
| DSC mean | 0.56 ± 0.10 | 0.61 ± 0.09 | 0.67 ± 0.13 | 0.37 ± 0.09 | 0.51 ± 0.17 |
| DSC median | 0.56 | 0.61 | 0.70 | 0.35 | 0.52 |
| H95% (mm) | 11.9 ± 3.5 | 11.4 ± 4.0 | 8.4 ± 3.0 | 15.3 ± 2.6 | 12.4 ± 3.4 |
R is the volume ration, DSC is the dice similarity coefficient, and H95% is the Hausdorff distance.