Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 22;5(8):1973–1982. doi: 10.1002/cam4.736

Table 1.

Association between TACC2 immunohistochemical status and clinicopathological parameters in 154 breast carcinoma cases

TACC2 status
+(n = 78) −(n = 76) P‐value
Agea (years) 56.1 ± 1.5 57.4 ± 1.3 0.53
Menopausal status
Premenopausal 30 25
Postmenopausal 48 51 0.47
Stage
I 36 37
II 29 27
III 13 12 0.95
NAC
Received 11 6
Not received 67 69 0.23
Pathological T factor (pT)
pT1 46 46
pT2‐4 32 40 0.84
Lymph node metastasis
Positive 32 28
Negative 46 48 0.59
Histological grade
1 (well) 25 24
2 (moderate) 31 36
3 (poor) 22 16 0.52
Estrogen receptor (ER) status
Positive 63 62
Negative 15 14 0.90
PR status
Positive 54 55
Negative 24 21 0.67
AR LIa (%) 29.7 ± 3.0 32.8 ± 3.0 0.46
HER2 status
Positive 13 10
Negative 65 66 0.54
Ki‐67 LIa (%) 17.5 ± 1.6 13.4 ± 1.3 0.047
a

Data are presented as mean ±SEM.

All other values represent the number of cases. Statistical analysis was evaluated by the Student's t‐test or a cross‐table using the chi‐squared test. P‐values less than 0.05 were considered significant, and described as boldface.