Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Hazards Rev. 2015 Jul 20;17(1):04015013. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)NH.1527-6996.0000193

Table 2.

Derived RIM Resilience Indices of the 52 Counties

County Predicted rank Second highest Second-group probability Resilience index
Cameron, TX 3 3 0.0 3.0
Wallacy, TX 2 3 0.0 2.0
Kenedy, TX 2 2 0.0 2.0
Kleberg, TX 2 2 0.0 2.0
Nueces, TX 4 2 0.31 3.38
San Patricio, TX 2 3 0.03 2.03
Aransas, TX 3 3 0.0 3.0
Calhoun, TX 3 3 0.0 3.0
Matagorda, TX 2 2 0.0 2.0
Brazoria, TX 3 2 0.11 2.89
Galverston, TX 4 4 0.0 4.0
Chambers, TX 3 3 0.0 3.0
Jefferson, TX 2 2 0.0 2.0
Orange, TX 2 2 0.0 2.0
Cameron, LA 2 2 0.0 2.0
Vermillion, LA 2 2 0.0 2.0
Iberia, LA 2 2 0.0 2.0
St. Mary, LA 2 1 0.02 1.98
Terrebonne, LA 1 4 0.15 1.45
Lafourche, LA 1 4 0.01 1.03
Jefferson, LA 4 1 0.01 3.97
Orleans, LA 2 2 0.0 2.0
Plaquemines, LA 1 1 0.0 1.0
St. Bernard, LA 1 1 0.0 1.0
Hancock, MS 1 1 0.0 1.0
Harrison, MS 2 1 0.12 1.88
Jackson, MS 2 1 0.05 1.95
Mobile, AL 4 4 0.0 4.0
Baldwin, AL 4 4 0.0 4.0
Escambia, FL 4 4 0.0 4.0
Santa Rosa, FL 4 4 0.0 4.0
Okaloosa, FL 4 4 0.0 4.0
Walton, FL 4 4 0.0 4.0
Bay, FL 4 4 0.0 4.0
Gulf, FL 4 4 0.0 4.0
Franklin, FL 4 4 0.0 4.0
Walkulla, FL 4 1 0.03 3.91
Jefferson, FL 2 2 0.0 2.0
Taylor, FL 4 4 0.0 4.0
Dixie, FL 2 3 0.01 2.01
Levy, FL 3 3 0.0 3.0
Citrus, FL 3 3 0.0 3.0
Hernando, FL 3 3 0.0 3.0
Pasco, FL 3 3 0.0 3.0
Hillsborough, FL 2 3 0.08 2.08
Pinellas, FL 2 3 0.01 2.01
Manatee, FL 3 3 0.0 3.0
Sarasota, FL 3 3 0.0 3.0
Charlotte, FL 3 3 0.0 3.0
Lee, FL 3 3 0.0 3.0
Collier, FL 3 3 0.0 3.0
Monroe, FL 2 2 0.0 2.0

Note: AL = Alabama; FL = Florida; LA = Louisiana; MS = Mississippi; TX = Texas.