Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 3.
Published in final edited form as: Hum Ecol Interdiscip J. 2005 Jun;33(3):329–363. doi: 10.1007/s10745-005-4142-9

Table II.

Pairwise Comparison of Means: Results of Tukey’s Simultaneous t-Tests

Poor/large
Average/small
Average/large
Average/small
Average/large
Average/large
Variable Poor/small Poor/small Poor/small Poor/large Average/small Poor/large
Village characteristics
 Number of villages
 Average number of HH sampled (−)* (−)* (−)*
Migrant status
 Proportion of HH with two migrants (−)* (−)* (−)*
 Proportion of HH with one migrant
 (Ref: HH with no migrants) (+)* (+)ms (+)ms
Household demographics
 Average age of respondent
 Average family size (−)*
Fishing behavior
 Proportion of HH using destructive gear (−)ms
 Proportion of HH that own a boat (+)* (+)* (+)*
 Average hours of fishing effort per HH (−)* (−)* (−)ms
Crew Size (Proportion of HH that fish on a boats with…)
 <=2 members (+)ms (+)* (+)* (+)* (+)*
 3 to 10 members (−)* (−)* (−)*
 (Ref: more than 10 members) (−)* (−)* (−)*
Poverty measure
 Natural log of HH spending (In rupiah) (−)ms

Note.

*

= significant at 5% level; ms-significant at 10% level.