. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 1.

Published in final edited form as: IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Jun 1;63(8):1563–1572. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2016.2574816

TABLE I.

Metrics on 400 registrations for all tested methods (mean ± std)

Method	DSC	MSD (mm)	HD (mm)	Time (min)
FSL	0.12 ± 0.19	37.92 ± 44.11	84.28 ± 59.96	951.73 ± 201.20
ANTS-CC	0.18 ± 0.21	27.15 ± 32.65	62.92 ± 44.60	411.60 ± 74.20
ANTS-QUICK-MI	0.27 ± 0.25	15.96 ± 19.22	49.66 ± 32.96	50.18 ± 21.93
IRTK	0.28 ± 0.26	19.07 ± 26.50	55.58 ± 39.26	220.27 ± 91.79
NIFTYREG	0.35 ± 0.29	15.72 ± 19.16	59.59 ± 42.60	116.91 ± 34.94
DEEDS	0.49 ± 0.26	8.63 ± 16.16	40.15 ± 32.11	3.73 ± 0.77

Note that ANTS-CC, ANTS-QUICK-MI, and NIFTYREG used two CPU cores for each registration process. The mean DSC across four large organs (liver, spleen, kidneys) is 0.19, 0.31, 0.43, 0.48, 0.55, and 0.70 for FSL, ANTS-CC, ANTS-QUICK-MI, IRTK, NIFTYREG, and DEEDS, respectively.