Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 3;11(8):e0159290. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159290

Table 6. Respondents’ opinions on aspects of current publication policies and process that contribute to non-dissemination of qualitative research studies and/or findings.

Opinion Editors % (n) (N = 121) Peer reviewers% (n) (N = 680)
Journal instructions to authors are seen to exclude some types of qualitative research 62.8 (76) 48.7 (331)
Journal recommendations on manuscript length impact on the fullness of reporting of findings from qualitative research 58.7 (71) 75.6 (514)
Editors disfavor certain types of research studies 51.2 (62) 54.3 (369)
Editors are less familiar with certain types of qualitative research 40.5 (49) 59.6 (405)
Editors are less interested in qualitative research on some topics 40.5 (49) 51.2 (348)
Editors are less interested in qualitative research from some geographic regions or areas 33.9 (41) 21.9 (149)
Peer reviewers disfavor certain types of research studies 30.6 (37) 46.3 (315)
Peer reviewers are less familiar with certain types of qualitative research 28.9 (35) 79.4 (540)
Peer reviewers are less interested in qualitative research on some topics 20.7 (25) 56.3 (383)
Peer reviewers are less interested in qualitative research from some geographic regions or areas 17.4 (21) 22.4 (152)
Other reasons (free text responses) 17.4 (21) 10.3 (70)