Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Feb 1.
Published in final edited form as: Brain Imaging Behav. 2017 Feb;11(1):185–193. doi: 10.1007/s11682-016-9516-7

Table 2.

Between Groups Areas of Activation

Between Group Condition Target Area Cluster Peak Voxel Wise P(uncorr) MNI Peak Z

9DAT>10DAT LetterNogo>LetterGo R inf parietal 334 0 44 −48 46 3.56

9DAT>10DAT SadNogo>SadGo L sup frontal, L & R sup medial frontal 1183 0 −14 52 26 3.63
R cerebellum 365 0 26 −74 −44 3.57
L paracentral lobule 267 .001 −8 −30 62 3.44
L & R PCC, precuneus 290 .001 −2 −50 26 3.10
R mid and inf occipital 291 .001 28 −96 −4 3.09

Group X Condition Interaction Sad/Letter Interaction L & R ACC, extending into sup medial frontal and medial orbital 1789 0 −14 42 4 3.49

Table 2 shows the between group differences in brain activation. The statistical significance threshold for examining this effect was set at p=0.01 and a cluster size of 219 voxels corresponded to a corrected p=0.05. Clusters of significant activity are represented with voxel of peak activation, peak Z-score, and MNI coordinates. MNI, Montreal Neurological Institute; L, left; R, right; sup, superior; inf, inferior; ant, anterior. LetterNogo>LetterGo (Letter No-go – Letter Go); HappyNogo>HappyGo (Happy No-go – Happy Go); SadNogo>SadGo (Sad No-go – Sad go); Group X Sad Emotion X Go/No-go Interaction (Interaction between group, sad stimuli, and response type). The statistical significance threshold for examining this effect was set at p=0.01 and a cluster size of 219 voxels corresponded to corrected p =0.05, except for the interaction between groups (10DAT & 9DAT) and condition (sad no-go>sad go, letter no-go > letter go) the statistical significance threshold for examining this effect was set at p=0.05 and a cluster size of 935 voxels corresponded to corrected p=0.05.