Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 21;2016:3498403. doi: 10.1155/2016/3498403

Table 2.

Clinical results of included studies.

Main author Number of patients Range of motion  Strength testing Mean MEPS Mean ASES Mean DASH
 Flexion/extension  Supination/pronation AVFS (%) AVSS (%) SAT NS
AVROM SAT NS AVP AVS SAT NS
Bain [10] 10 5°–146° 9 1 80 81 9 1 NR NR 10 — NR NR NR

Greenberg [11] 11 −4°–141° 11 — 73 74 11 — 97 82 11 — NR NR NR

Spencer Jr. [20] 15               100 100 15 — NR NR  
Group 1∗ (6 pt)   −1.5°–139.1° 6 — 75.8 76.6 6 —             3.1
Group 2$ (9 pt)   −1.5°–138.5° 9 — 77.5 76.5 9 —             1

Peeters [21] 17 −2°–134° 16 1 77 76 12 5 80 91 11 6 93.8 NR NR

Dillon [26] 17 0°–135° 17 — 67 72 13 4 101 99 15 2 NR 98.7 NR

Gupta [27] 8 0°–143° 8 — 77 81 8 — NR NR — — 100 NR 0

Banerjee [23] 27                            
Group 1! (18 pt)   1.1°–147.2° 18   89.4 85.8 18   94 92.9 18   100 98 0.3
Group 2& (9 pt)   −1.7°–142.2°   9 88.9 78.3   9 88 77.6   9 77.8 87.8 5.2

Total 105   94 (89.5)% 11 (10.5%)     86 (82%) 19 (18%)     80 (82.4%) 17 (17.6%)      

Group 1∗: supervised physiotherapy group; Group 2$: no therapy; Group 1!: without complications; Group 2&: with complications; MEPS: Mayo Elbow Performance Score; ASES: American Shoulder & Elbow Surgeons Score; DASH: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder & Hand Score; NR: not reported; AVROM: average range of motion; AVP: average pronation; AVS: average supination; AVFS: average flexion strength; AVSS: average supination strength; SAT: satisfied; NS: nonsatisfied; studies in Group B are highlighted with bold.