Table 2.

Prevalence and accuracy and agreement of identification methods (weighted analyses)

Reference standard		Fried’s frailty criteria (Ref.) frail 11.6 %				Expert panel (Ref.) frail 22.8 %
Identification method	Frail %	AUC	Asymptotic 95 % confidence interval		Kappa fried	AUC	Asymptotic 95 % confidence interval		Kappa panel
			Lower	Upper			Lower	Upper
PRISMA-7
≥ 3	24.8	0.849	0.830	0.869	0.469	0.818	0.800	0.836	0.612
≥ 4	11.9	0.723	0.693	0.753	0.442	0.699	0.676	0.722	0.476
≥ 5	3.6	0.594	0.594	0.594	0.270	0.546	0.523	0.569	0.131
Self-Rated Health
≤ 6	27.7	0.831	0.809	0.853	0.377	0.733	0.712	0.754	0.437
≤ 5	11.1	0.725	0.692	0.659	0.435	0.649	0.625	0.673	0.363
≤ 4	4.6	0.654	0.619	0.689	0.406	0.599	0.575	0.623	0.274
FI
≥ 0.20	32.9	0.766	0.743	0.789	0.303	0.784	0.765	0.802	0.498
≥ 0.25	14.8	0.813	0.787	0.839	0.566	0.747	0.724	0.769	0.568
≥ 0.30	7.4	0.693	0.662	0.724	0.461	0.644	0.620	0.667	0.376
≥ 0.35	4.9	0.648	0.617	0.680	0.397	0.608	0.584	0.631	0.296
≥ 0.40	1.8	0.578	0.547	0.609	0.244	0.540	0.517	0.563	0.118
Interrai Self-Reliance Screen	15.6	0.778	0.750	0.805	0.483	0.719	0.697	0.741	0.490
EFS
≥ 4	16.0	0.777	0.750	0.805	0.490	0.738	0.549	0.596	0.199
≥ 6	5.0	0.616	0.585	0.648	0.312	0.573	0.716	0.760	0.534
ATC
≥ 5	31.9	0.715	0.689	0.741	0.244	0.666	0.645	0.688	0.291
≥ 6	22.5	0.739	0.712	0.766	0.339	0.660	0.638	0.683	0.323
≥ 7	18.2	0.763	0.736	0.790	0.422	0.689	0.666	0.711	0407
Judgment GP	28.6	0.734	0.708	0.760	0.287	0.754	0.734	0.774	0.463
GFI
≥ 4	36.4	0.716	0.691	0.741	0.225	0.702	0.682	0.723	0.332
≥ 5	25.3	0.723	0.696	0.750	0.296	0.690	0.585	0.631	0.364
≥ 6	12.6	0.633	0.603	0.664	0.257	0.608	0.669	0.712	0.255
ISAR PC
≥ 2	52.9	0.649	0.624	0.675	0.117	0.635	0.614	0.656	0.185
≥ 3	49.6	0.668	0.643	0.693	0.139	0.657	0.637	0.677	0.223
≥ 4	49.6	0.668	0.643	0.693	0.139	0.657	0.637	0.677	0.223
Gait speed	23.9	0.865	0.846	0.884	0.478	0.754	0.732	0.776	0.490