Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 4;6(7):e218. doi: 10.1038/nutd.2016.20

Table 2. Linear regression analysis evaluating the association of pasta consumption with BMI in Moli-sani and INHES participantsa.

  Moli-sani population (N=14 402)
  Women (N=7216) Men (N=7186)
Pasta-energy residuals
 Unadjusted models −0.012 (<0.001) −0.002 (0.07)
 Multi-adjusted modelsb −0.007 (0.003) −0.001 (0.58)
Pasta-body weight residualsc
 Unadjusted models −0.78 (<0.001) −0.29 (<0.001)
 Multi-adjusted modelsb −0.87 (<0.001) −0.51 (<0.001)
  INHES population (N=8964)
  Women (N=4782) Men (N=4182)
Pasta-energy residuals
 Unadjusted models −0.004 (0.01) 0.005 (0.01)
 Multi-adjusted modelsd −0.001 (0.36) 0.002 (0.05)
Pasta-body weight residualse
 Unadjusted models −0.08 (0.25) −0.40 (<0.001)
 Multi-adjusted modelsd −0.18 (0.01) −0.30 (<0.001)

Abbreviation: BMI, body mass index.

a

Results derived from linear regression analysis with main outcome the BMI (kg m−2) and independent variable the pasta-energy residuals or pasta-body weight residuals. Results are presented as β-coefficients (P-value) (for 1 unit increase in predicted residuals).

b

Models have been adjusted for age, socioeconomic status, physical activity level, energy intake and Mediterranean pattern adherence.

c

The β-coefficient for 1 unit increase in pasta-body weight residuals corresponded to 35 g per day increase in pasta intake.

d

Models have been adjusted for age, profession type, marital status, physical activity, energy intake and Mediterranean pattern adherence.

e

The β-coefficient for 1 unit increase in pasta-body weight residuals corresponded to 48 g per day increase in pasta intake.