Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 3;95(2):278–287. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.15-0290

Table 3.

Unadjusted random effect multinomial regression models of self-reported diarrhea and vomiting among students and risk factors at Monastic schools across Myanmar (N = 2,082)

Factor Diarrhea only (N = 244) Vomiting only (N = 253) Diarrhea and vomiting (N = 233)
n (%) RR (95% CI) P value n (%) RR (95% CI) P value n (%) RR (95% CI) P value
Student level
 Student characteristics
  Sex
   Male 129 (12.3) 1.14 (0.87–6–1.52) 0.37 134 (12.7) 1.14 (0.86–1.51) 0.35 122 (11.6) 1.11 (0.83–1.50) 0.46
   Female 115 (11.2) Ref. 119 (11.6) Ref. 111 (10.8) Ref.
  Grade
   4 128 (12.4) 1.41 (1.06–1.87) 0.02 146 (14.1) 1.74 (1.31–2.31) < 0.01 125 (12.1) 1.48 (1.11–1.98) 0.01
   5 116 (11.1) Ref. 107 (10.2) Ref. 108 (10.3) Ref.
 Hygiene behavior
  Poor handwashing before meals
   Yes 53 (12.2) 1.09 (0.77–1.56) 0.62 70 (16.1) 1.51 (1.08–2.10) 0.02 64 (14.7) 1.49 (1.06–2.10) 0.02
   No 191 (11.6) Ref. 183 (11.1) Ref. 169 (10.3) Ref.
  Poor handwashing after toilet use
   Yes 52 (11.9) 1.02 (0.71–1.45) 0.93 61 (14.0) 1.19 (0.85–1.68) 0.31 59 (13.5) 1.27 (0.90–1.80) 0.18
   No 192 (11.7) Ref. 192 (11.7) Ref. 174 (10.6) Ref.
  Inconsistent toilet use
   Yes 115 (10.9) 1.00 (0.74–1.37) 0.98 139 (13.1) 1.37 (1.01–1.86) 0.04 133 (12.6) 1.50 (1.10–2.05) 0.01
   No 129 (12.6) Ref. 114 (11.2) Ref. 100 (9.8) Ref.
  Poor hygiene education recall
   Yes 32 (11.5) 0.92 (0.60–1.41) 0.71 31 (11.2) 0.85 (0.55–1.31) 0.47 38 (13.7) 1.19 (0.79–1.78) 0.40
   No 212 (11.8) Ref. 222 (12.3) Ref. 195 (10.8) Ref.
School level
 Type of toilet
  Pour flush
   Yes 136 (11.4) 0.86 (0.56–1.31) 0.48 139 (11.6) 0.83 (0.54–1.27) 0.39 127 (10.6) 0.81 (0.53–1.25) 0.35
   No 108 (12.2) Ref. 114 (12.9) Ref. 106 (12.0) Ref.
  Latrine
   Yes 139 (11.7) 1.09 (0.70–1.70) 0.70 165 (13.8) 1.55 (0.99–2.42) 0.06 147 (12.3) 1.41 (0.90–2.21) 0.14
   No 105 (11.8) Ref. 88 (9.9) Ref. 86 (9.7) Ref.
  Septic tank
   Yes 101 (10.4) 0.70 (0.46–1.07) 0.77 110 (11.3) 0.77 (0.50–1.16) 0.87 88 (9.0) 0.60 (0.39–0.93) 0.39
   No 143 (12.9) Ref. 143 (12.9) Ref. 145 (13.1) Ref.
  Unclean toilets
   Yes 129 (11.2) 0.85 (0.54–1.34) 0.49 142 (12.3) 0.97 (0.62–1.52) 0.91 121 (10.5) 0.82 (0.52–1.29) 0.40
   No 115 (12.4) Ref. 111 (11.9) Ref. 112 (12.0) Ref.
 Number of toilets for students*
  1–2 73 (9.6) 0.65 (0.38–1.10) 0.11 109 (14.3) 1.26 (0.75–2.12) 0.39 90 (11.8) 0.84 (0.50–1.41) 0.51
  3–5 74 (12.5) 0.80 (0.48–1.34) 0.40 69 (11.7) 0.96 (0.57–1.64) 0.90 50 (8.5) 0.56 (0.33–0.97) 0.04
  6–20 97 (13.3) Ref. 75 (10.3) Ref. 93 (12.8) Ref.
 No separate toilets for girls
  Yes 97 (10.1) 0.69 (0.45–1.07) 0.10 135 (14.0) 1.20 (0.78–1.85) 0.41 82 (8.5) 0.57 (0.37–0.89) 0.01
  No 147 (13.1) Ref. 118 (10.5) Ref. 151 (13.5) Ref.
 Handwashing facilities
  Insufficient soap available
   Yes 156 (10.5) 0.62 (0.40–0.97) 0.04 181 (12.2) 0.88 (0.56–1.39) 0.59 164 (11.0) 0.84 (0.53–1.32) 0.59
   No 88 (14.8) Ref. 72 (12.1) Ref. 69 (11.6) Ref.
  Insufficient water available
   Yes 42 (8.3) 0.62 (0.36–1.06) 0.08 56 (11.1) 0.84 (0.50–1.43) 0.52 72 (14.2) 1.33 (0.79–2.22) 0.28
   No 202 (12.8) Ref. 197 (12.5) Ref. 161 (10.2) Ref.
  Number of handwash stations*
   0–1 107 (12.3) 1.24 (0.72–2.16) 0.44 115 (13.2) 1.62 (0.92–2.84) 0.10 107 (12.3) 1.22 (0.70–2.12) 0.48
   2–3 85 (11.5) 1.04 (0.59–1.85) 0.89 95 (12.9) 1.40 (0.79–2.52) 0.25 73 (9.9) 0.88 (0.49–1.57) 0.66
   4–20 52 (11.0) Ref. 43 (9.1) Ref. . 53 (11.2) Ref.
  Unimproved water storage
   Yes 12 (14.8) 1.57 (0.67–3.64) 0.30 12 (14.8) 1.35 (0.57–3.17) 0.49 7 (8.6) 0.84 (0.32–2.21) 0.72
   No 232 (11.6) Ref. 241 (12.0) Ref. 226 (11.3) Ref.

RR = risk ratio; CI = confidence interval.

*

Groups represent sample tertiles.