Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 4;6:31031. doi: 10.1038/srep31031

Table 1. Characteristics of the parental and the integrated TKS linkage maps.

LG AFLP marker
COS/SSR Loci TM     cM
IP1 IP2 CM
a) P1-L MAP
1 16 0 9 10 35     93.9
2 20 0 7 3 30     107.4
3 31 0 10 4 45     116.5
4 28 0 7 11 46     120.7
5 29 0 10 5 44     112.8
6 24 0 7 2 33     103.6
7 17 0 10 4 31     65.4
8 20 0 10 1 31     69.1
TOTAL Mean 185 0 70 40 295     789.4
23.1 0.0 8.8 5.0 36.9     98.7
b) P2-H MAP
1 0 16 8 10 34     80.4
2 0 16 7 0 23     83.6
3 0 29 8 5 42     119.5
4 0 33 7 10 50     122.6
5 0 27 11 5 43     114.1
6 0 25 8 1 34     123.1
7 0 18 7 8 33     84.9
8 0 24 11 3 38     81.9
TOTAL Mean 0 188 67 42 297     820.1
0.0 23.5 8.4 5.3 37.1     102.5
c) INTEGRATED MAP
            AFLP AP COS/EST-SSR AP cM
1 16 16 10 12 54 7 8 101.4
2 20 16 7 3 46 7 0 116.1
3 31 29 10 8 78 8 5 121.4
4 28 33 7 16 84 7 7 135.9
5 29 27 11 11 78 10 5 118.6
6 24 25 9 5 63 6 4 115.7
7 17 18 10 10 55 7 2 96.1
8 20 24 11 5 60 10 1 88.9
TOTAL Mean 185 188 75 70 518 62 32 894.1
23.1 23.5 9.4 8.8 64.8 7.8 4 111.8

LG = linkage group, IP1, IP2 = Parent 1,2, CM = Common markers, TM = Total N° of markers,

AP = Anchor points based on AFLP or COS/EST-SSR markers, cM = LG in centiMorgans.; P1-L: Parent 1

low rubber producer; P2-H: Parent 2 high rubber producer.