Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 4;16:278. doi: 10.1186/s12888-016-0931-5

Table 7.

Study Characteristics

Authors (Date), Country Samples Baseline Characteristics MS Diagnosis (years) Disability Status Recruitment Method Measures Validity/ Reliability Tested
Aikens et al. (1999) [20], USA MS=105, Depressed=34, Healthy=80, Diabetes=71, Chronic pain=80 MS: M age=41.9(SD= 9.0), 63% female; Depressed: M age=39.3 (SD=14.6), 65% female; Healthy controls: M age M age=34.4 (SD=8.3), 50% female; Diabetes: M age=55.9 (SD=16.7), 56% female; Chronic pain: M age=45.0 (SD=13.9), 56% female M = 11 years Expanded Disability Status Scale = 0.0 - 7.5 (Median = 3.8) Moderate Disability University Hospital BDI-II Construct validity; content validity; internal reliability (cronbach's alpha)
Amtmann et al. (2014) [21], USA MS = 455 M age=52.9 (SD=10.8); 83% female (N=377) and 17% male (N=78); M = 14.5 (SD = 10) Moderate level University Hospital/ National Multiple Sclerosis Society charter CESD–10, PHQ-9 PROMIS-D-8 Evaluation of dimensionality; inter-item correlation; discriminant/convergent validity
Avasarala et al. (2003) [22], USA MS=120 Ages: 20–29 N=6, 30–39 N=25, 40–49 N=53, 50–59 N=32, 60–69 N=4; 71% female NA NA University Hospital YSQ Criterion validity
Beeney and Arnett (2008) [23], USA 3 year follow-up MS=52; cross-sectional analysis, MS=96. N=52: M age=46.57 (SD=7.61); N=96: M age=47.41 (SD=8.98). M (T1) =14.04 (SD = 9.37); M (T2) = 16.87 (SD = 9.24) EDSS (T1) =4.55 (SD = 1.44)
EDSS (T2) = 4.71 (SD = 1.61)
University Hospital/ National Multiple Sclerosis Society charter CMDI Construct validity
Benedict et al. (2003) [24], USA MS=54 M age=42.8 (SD=9.7), 79% female NA EDSS median = 2.5 (R = 0.0 - 7.0) University Hospital BDI-FS Criterion and construct validity
Chang et al. (2003) [25], USA MS=433; plus 'standardisation sample' n=420 MS: M age=45.0 (SD=10.0), 69.4% female; Standardisation sample described in Nyenhuis et al. (1998) [26]: M age=43.1 NA NA University Hospital CMDI Content validity, internal reliability, construct validity
Honarmand and Feinstein (2009) [27], Canada Study 1: MS=140; Study 2: MS=40, MD=21, Matched controls (no MD) = 19 M age=44.6 (SD=10.3), 75% female M = 8.8 (SD = 6.8) EDSS = 4.0 (SD = 2.34) Hospital HADS Criterion validity
Mohr et al. (1997) [28], USA MS =184, DEP =72, controls (college students) = 555 MS: M age=44.0, 68% female; DEP: M age=47.5, 51% female; Controls: M age=20.2, 55% NA NA University Hospital BDI Face validity
Mohr et al. (2007) [29], USA MS = 260 M age=51 (SD=10.5), 73% female M = 19 (SD = 10.5) NA University Hospital Two-item measure Criterion validity, construct validity
Moran and Mohr (2005) [30], USA MS (with depression)=42 Mage=43.0 (SD=10.3), 69% female M = 6.6 (SD = 6.1) NA University Hospital/ referrals/ National Multiple Sclerosis Society Charter BDI Construct validity
Nicholl et al. (2001) [31], UK MS=88 M age=48.97 (SD=8.9), 75% female M = 11.8 (SD = 7.5) NA Hospital/Rehabilitation ward HADS Criterion validity, construct validity
Nyenhuis et al. (1995) [32], USA MS=84, DEP=101, controls (MS matched)=87 MS: M age=49.3 (SD=11.1), 75% female; DEP: M age=50.5 (SD=10.7), 65% female; Controls: M age=49.6 (SD=11.6), 75% female NA EDSS = 4.74 (SD = 3.6) Community based BDI, MDI Construct validity
Pandya et al. (2005) [33], Canada MS=47 M age=39.3 (range 18–56), 72.3% female NA EDSS = 3.0 University hospital/referrals to Psychiatric care CES-D Criterion validity, construct validity
Patten et al. (2005) [34], Canada MS=567 M age=48 (Range 19–76), 75.7% female NA NA University Hospital CES-D Construct validity
Patten et al. (2010) [35], Canada year 0 N=1670 year 1; N=1336 year 2; N=648, year 3 N=186 15.9% aged 18–34, 29.5% aged 35–44, 33.6% aged 45–54, 21.0% aged 55+; 77.1% female NA EDSS (mode) = 4 (R = 4–8) University Hospital CES-D Test-retest reliability
Sjonnesen et al. (2012) [36], Canada MS=173, Controls (general population)=3304 MS: M age=52.9 (95%CI 51.2–54.6), 74.6% female; Controls: M age=44.4 (95%CI 44.0–44.8), 67.7% female M = 14.4 (95%CI = 13–15.8) 27.1% (46/170) unable to work Patient Registry/ Hospital PHQ-9 Content validity, construct validity, internal reliability
Solari et al. (2003) [37], Italy MS=213, Healthy controls (matched to MS)=213, DEP=32 MS: M age=38 (SD=9.2), 66% female; DEP: M age=51.8 (SD=14.15), 78% female; Healthy controls: M age=38.3 (SD=9.4), 55.9% female. M = 9.1 (SD = 6.9) EDSS = 2.9 (SD = 1.6) University Hospital CMDI Internal reliability, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity, criterion validity
Strober and Arnett (2010) [38], USA MS-DEP=17, MS-NON-DEP=67, healthy controls=22 MS-DEP: M age=45.24 (SD=8.39), 82% female; MS-NON: M age=47.93 (SD=9.30), 84% female; Controls: M age=46.18 (SD=13.36), 82% female. M depressed - 10.59 (SD = 6.42)
M MS-NON = 11.15 (SD = 8.66)
EDSS depressed = 5.18 (SD = 1.5)
EDSS MS- NON= 4.32 (SD = 1,54
National Multiple Sclerosis Society charter mBDI Construct validity
Sullivan et al. (1995) [39], Canada MS=46 M age=34.4, 78% female NA NA Hospital/ referrals BDI Criterion validity, construct validity
Vahter et al. (2007) [40], Estonia (from Manoj and Sivan, 2007 [31]) MS=134 M age=43.8 (SD=12.4), 73.9% female M = 9.9 (SD = 8.5) EDSS = 5.8 (SD = 2.5) Hospital One-item measure Criterion validity
Verdier-Taillefer et al. (2001) [41], France MS=857, GP patients=1598, healthy workers=403 MS: M age=47.0 (SD=7.2), 63.2% female; GP patients: M age=44.6 (SD=8.8), 59.1% female; Healthy workers: M age=42.9 (SD=6.3), 55.3% female NA NA CES-D Content validity, internal reliability, construct validity

Note: MS Multiple Sclerosis, MD Major Depression, DEP Depressed, NA Not Available