Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 3;57(4):406–411. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrw010

Table 3.

Dosimetric comparison of CI and PTV for the three IMRT techniques (mean ± SD)

P value
SIB Two-phase IMRT SEQ-SIB SIB vs two-phase IMRT SIB vs SEQ-SIB SEQ-SIB vs two-phase IMRT
CI
 PTVboost 1.09 ± 0.05 1.39 ± 0.14 1.14 ± 0.07 <0.0001 0.02 <0.0001
 PTVelective 1.34 ± 0.12 1.80 ± 0.28 1.60 ± 0.18 <0.0001 <0.0001 0.01
 PTVboost
V93 (%) 99.8 ± 0.2 99.8 ± 0.2 99.7 ± 0.3 0.37 0.27 0.09
 D2 (%) 108.9 ± 1.5 110.4 ± 2.6 109.0 ± 1.7 0.03 0.85 0.049
 D99 (%) 96.8 ± 1.1 98.4 ± 1.8 97.0 ± 1.2 0.001 0.63 0.005
 D95 (%) 100 101.9 ± 1.4 100.3 ± 0.1 <0.0001 <0.0001 <0.0001
PTVelective
 V93 (%) 99.8 ± 0.2 99.9 ± 0.1 99.9 ± 0.1 0.02 0.38 0.35
 D99 (%) 97.3 ± 2.2 101.9 ± 3.5 100.4 ± 2.7 <0.0001 0.0003 0.14
 D95 (%) 102.0 ± 1.5 106.2 ± 3.7 104.6 ± 2.7 <0.0001 0.0007 0.14