Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 3;29(6):1695–1703. doi: 10.1111/cobi.12548

Table 2.

Variables included in linear mixed models developed to explain variation in the log response ratio of species richness in planted and secondary forest stands relative to old‐growth forest

Variables in modelb
Modela group log10(age) group*log10(age) lat trans df AICc ∆AICc Marginal R 2
Null 3 94.81 20.01 0.17
1 + + + + 17 74.80 0.00 0.56
2 + + + 16 79.70 4.90 0.54
3 + + + + + 20 80.83 6.03 0.58
a

In addition to the null model, only models with ∆AICc < 7 are shown (i.e., those with considerable support [Burnham & Anderson 2002]).

b

Abbreviations: group, functional groups comprising lichens, ectomycorrhizal fungi, litter fungi, deadwood fungi, saproxylic beetles, and non‐saproxylic beetles in coniferous and broadleaved forest; log10(age), log10 of stand age in years; lat, centered latitude; trans, transition category representing the origin of the treatment stands, including clearcut planted, clearcut secondary, fire planted, and fire secondary.