Table 4. ANOVA’s for variables which response was not different for the three stimulation modes.
| SIGNIFICANT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AR-CL vs AL-CR vs Sham | MAIN EFFECTS | INTERACTIONS | ||||
| FACTOR TIME | ||||||
| STIM MODE | TIME | OPTION | LATERALITY | MUSCLE | ||
| RT | F2,24 = 0.2 p = 0.9 | F1,12 = 0.1 p = 0.8 | F1,12 = 23.2 p<0.001 | F1,12 = 4.9 p = 0.046 | N.A | N.S |
| ηp2 = 0.659 | ηp2 = 0.291 | |||||
| MT | F2,24 = 0.1 p = 0.9 | F1,12 = 0.3 p = 0.6 | F1,12 = 1.3 p = 0.3 | F1,12 = 82.2 p<0.001 | N.A | N.S |
| ηp2 = 0.873 | ||||||
| CV-PMT | F2,24 = 0.7 p = 0.5 | F1,12 = 25.1 p<0.001 | F1,12 = 1.3 p = 0.3 | F1,12 = 1.5 p = 0.2 | F2,24 = 0.1 p = 0.4 | N.S |
| ηp2 = 0.677 | ||||||
| CV-RT | F2,24 = 0.6 p = 0.6 | F1,12 = 7.1 p = 0.020 | F1,12 = 0.3 p = 0.6 | F1,12 = 1.9 p = 0.2 | N.A | N.S |
| ηp2 = 0.373 | ||||||
| CV-MT | F2,24 = 1.4 p = 0.3 | F1,12 = 0.7 p = 0.4 | F1,12 = 0.1 p = 0.7 | F1,12 = 3.1 p = 0.1 | N.A | N.S |
N.A = not applicable since RT, MT and their CV’s were not obtained from EMG but from contact plates. N.S = none was significant. Partial etha squared (ηp2) is reported for significant main effects.