Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 1;16(17):1–69.

Table A2:

GRADE Evidence Profile for Comparison of Fecal Microbiota Therapy to Antibiotics

Number of Studies (Design) Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication Bias Upgrade Considerations Quality
2 RCTs No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected Likely (−1) Large magnitude of effect (+1) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High ⊕⊕⊕ Moderate
40 observational case series Serious limitations (−1) Serious limitations (−1) Serious limitations (−1) Serious limitations (−1) Very likely (−2) Dose-response gradient (+1) ⊕⊕ Low ⊕ Very Low
  Very serious limitations (−2) Very serious limitations (−2) Very serious limitations (−2) Very serious limitations (−2)   All plausible confounding increases confidence in estimate (+1)
Other considerations (+1)
Resolution
2 RCTs No serious limitations No serious limitations Serious limitations (−1)b No serious limitations Undetected ⊕⊕⊕ Moderate
40 observational case series Serious limitations (−1)a No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected ⊕⊕ Low
Quality of life
0 studies
Mortality
2 RCTs No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Very serious limitations (−2)c Undetected   ⊕⊕ Low
40 observational case series Serious limitations (−1)a No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected ⊕⊕ Low
Adverse events
2 RCTs Serious limitations (−1)d No serious limitations No serious limitations Serious limitations (−1)c Undetected ⊕⊕ Low
40 observational case series Serious limitations (−1)a No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected ⊕⊕ Low

Abbreviations: GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; RCT, randomized controlled trial.

a

Observational uncontrolled, mostly retrospective case series.

b

Most fecal microbiota therapy in Ontario is via enema. Studies published to date mostly use colonoscopy and nasoduodenal or nasogastric tube.

c

Optimal information size not met. Wide confidence intervals.

d

Lack of long-term follow-up in RCTs (up to 10 weeks).