Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 19;5:e17029. doi: 10.7554/eLife.17029

Figure 5. A/R tRNA and RelA rearrange toward the 30S subunit in Structures II to IV.

(A) A/R tRNA settles into the decoding center of the 30S subunit between Structures II (grey) and IV (colored as in Figure 1). Structures II and IV were aligned on the 16S rRNA. RelA is not shown. The positions of A1492 in Structures II and IV are labeled for reference. (B) A/R tRNA and RelA positions in Structures II (grey), III (gold) and IV (colored as in Figure 1). (C) and (D) Two views showing that RelA shifts with the A/R tRNA between Structure II (grey) and Structure IV (colored as in Figure 1). The TGS domain, which interacts with the acceptor arm of A/R tRNA, moves more than the RIS and ACT domains. The superposition of Structures II and IV was performed by structural alignment of the 16S rRNA.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.17029.017

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Comparison of A/R tRNA to A/T and A/A tRNA.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

(A) The position of A/R tRNA in Structure II (green) is compared with the A/T tRNA (purple) in E. coli 70S•EF-Tu•GDP•kirromycin•Phe-tRNAPhe complex (PDB: 5AFI; [Fischer et al., 2015]) and A/A tRNA (pink) in 70S ribosome complex with 3 tRNAs (PDB: 4V6F; [Jenner et al., 2010]). P/P tRNA from Structure II is also shown. Superposition was obtained by the structural alignment of the 16S rRNA. (B) Conformations of the A/R tRNA in Structures II (grey) and IV (green) are compared with the A/T tRNA (purple) in the E. coli 70S•EF-Tu•GDP•kirromycin•Phe-tRNAPhe complex (PDB: 5AFI; [Fischer et al., 2015]). Superposition was obtained by structural alignment of the anticodon (nt 34–36). The 3′-end of A/R tRNA in Structure II is displaced by ~10 Å from the 3′-end of A/T tRNA.