Table 1. Experimentally reported glass formers.

Reported	Predicted	References
Cu50Zr50, Cu56Zr44 and Cu64Zr36	Cu100−nZrn, 50<n<55	42,79
Ni100−nZrn 35<n<45, 60<n<63	Ni42.8Zr57.2Ni55.5Zr44.5	46
Cu100−nHfn 35<n<60	Cu16.7Hf83.3Cu37.5Hf62.5Cu66.7Hf33.3	65
Au75Si25	Au80Si20	66
Be100−nTin 59<n<63	Be33.3Ti66.7Be42.8Ti57.2	67
Ni81P19	Ni60P40Ni40P60Ni83.3P16.7	68
Au20La80	Au20La80Au37.5La62.5Au62.5La37.5Au80La20	69
Au35Ni65	—	70
Be100−nZrn 50<n<70	Be37.5Zr62.5	67
Cu50Ti50, Cu58Ti42, Cu66Ti34	Cu37.5Ti62.5, Cu66.7Ti33.3	71
Nb30Ni70, Nb40.5Ni59.5	Nb44.4Ni55.6Nb50Ni50Nb62.5Ni37.5Nb83Ni17	72,73
Ni60Ta40	Ni55.6Ta44.4	74
Ni40Ti60	Ni16.7Ti83.3Ni25Ti75Ni37.5Ti62.5Ni50Ti50Ni55Ti45Ni66.7Ti33.3	75
Pd100−nSin 5<n<25	Pd60Si40	76
P25Pt75	P20Pt80P33.3Pt66.7P44Pt56	77
Fe100−nZrn 57<n<80	Fe42.8Zr57.2	78

List of 16 reported glass-forming alloys used for training the spectral descriptor. Whenever a broad glass-forming region was reported we counted two peaks, one at the beginning of the region and one at the end. This approach leads to a total of 26 peaks used as references. An empty entry at the second column means that no glass-forming composition was predicted, that is, a miss. The second column includes both peaks that correspond to the reported ones, as well as a few that do not correspond to any of the reported glass-forming alloys.