Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 5;47:75. doi: 10.1186/s13567-016-0363-8

Table 3.

ChISGs identified by RNA-seq using Baggerly’s test but not Kal’s test using standard criteria (FC > 3 or FDR < 0.01)

Feature ID Baggerley’s weighted proportions FC Baggerley’s FDR p value correction Kal’s relaxed FDR < 0.05a
FAM26F 148 0.0000 Yes
THEMIS2 118 0.0004
ENSGALG00000026152 55 0.0000
ENSGALG00000005148 54 0.0043
ENSGALG00000003110 52 0.0050
IL4I1 26 0.0040
C1orf168 24 0.0001
SPIRE2 18 0.0041
HRH1 17 0.0001
AZIN2 14 0.0000
ENSGALG00000029181 14 0.0000
ENSGALG00000001629 12 0.0001
B3GNT4 9 0.0000
GDPD4 8 0.0000
ATP6V1G3 7 0.0002
DUSP15 7 0.0002
IKBKE 7 0.0001
ANGPTL7 6 0.0000
ARHGEF28 6 0.0004
KCNJ5 6 0.0000
CHRD 5 0.0000 Yes
ENSGALG00000002823 5 0.0005
ENSGALG00000004772 5 0.0000
ENSGALG00000006325 5 0.0000
ENSGALG00000027955 5 0.0000
FUT10 5 0.0000
TOR4A 5 0.0001
C1QTNF1 4 0.0000
CYBRD1 4 0.0000
ENSGALG00000000819 4 0.0028
ENSGALG00000020899 4 0.0000
ISLR 4 0.0000
JAM2 4 0.0000
KIAA0226 4 0.0028
MALL 4 0.0002
MAOA 4 0.0000
RBM43 4 0.0015

aChISGs significant by Kal’s Z test under relaxed criteria (FDR < 0.05).