Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 5;9:431. doi: 10.1186/s13071-016-1693-0

Table 3.

Results of geostatistical models predicting malaria parasite prevalence in children 1–59 months, Zambia 2006–2012

Predictor Full model Prediction model
OR 95 % BCI OR 95 % BCI
Age in years < 1 (ref)
1–2 1.85 (1.48–2.32)
2–3 3.20 (2.57–3.97)
3–4 3.14 (2.53–3.90)
4–5 3.98 (3.19–4.95)
Wealth Poorest (ref)
Second 0.88 (0.74–1.04)
Third 0.76 (0.63–0.91)
Fourth 0.62 (0.50–0.77)
Richest 0.36 (0.24–0.52)
Population size per km-sq < 1000
At least 1000 0.56 (0.35–0.89) 0.45 (0.28–0.72)
HH ITN ownership 0
≥ 1 0.74 (0.64–0.86)
Cluster ITN per person 0.62 (0.27–1.37) 0.42 (0.18–0.93)
Cluster IRS rate 0.30 (0.18–0.51) 0.25 (0.15–0.43)
Distance to nearest water (km) 0.98 (0.95–1.02) 0.98 (0.94–1.02)
Altitude (km) 0.19 (0.07–0.50) 0.17 (0.07–0.45)
Enhanced Vegetation Index (2 SDsa) 1.98 (1.48–2.65) 2.09 (1.55–2.81)
Rainfall (mm) (2 SDs) 2.04 (1.38–3.00) 2.03 (1.38–2.97)
Spatial variance 1.81 (1.35–2.39) 1.78 (1.33–2.35)

Odds ratio (OR) and 95 % Bayesian Credibility Interval (BCI) presented where relevant

a SD standard deviation