Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 7;11(8):1360–1368. doi: 10.2215/CJN.11941115

Table 3.

Stimulated T cell activation subsets prerituximab and 6 months postrituximab in FSGS rituximab responders and nonresponders compared with patients with minimal change nephrotic syndrome in relapse and healthy controls

Immunologic Subsets Subset, %
FSGS Rituximab MCNS in Relapse, n=22 Control, n=30
FSGS Rituximab Responders, n=12 FSGS Rituximab Nonresponders, n=10
Prerituximab 6 mo Postrituximab Prerituximab 6 mo Postrituximab
T cell activation
 CD69+CD3+ 89.1±8.6 92.2±7.0 93.3±3.3 90.0±10.7 89.1±7.6 91.4±9.4
 CD154+CD4+CD3+ 54.9±28.1a 74.8±17.2b 78.9±16.4 78.4±13.3 64.2±23.5 75.7±13.2
 IFN-γ+CD3+ 0.6±0.8a,c,d 7.1±7.7b 7.5±6.1 7.2±6.7 7.8±11.2 12.8±11.2
 IL-2+CD3+ 0.2±0.5a,c 7.9±10.9b 4.0±4.7 3.4±4.8 4.3±7.4 6.9±8.4

Results are expressed as mean±SD. MCNS, minimal change nephrotic syndrome. Comparison between groups was performed using the Mann–Whitney U Test with Bonferroni correction for multiple subset comparison.

a

P<0.05: comparing FSGS rituximab responders and healthy controls.

b

P<0.05: paired analysis comparing prerituximab and 6 months postrituximab therapy (Wilcoxon signed rank test).

c

P<0.05: comparing FSGS rituximab responders and FSGS rituximab nonresponders.

d

P<0.05: comparing FSGS rituximab responders and MCNS in relapse.