Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 8;8(2):317–333. doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12263

Table 7.

Land availability and predicted ES impacts of planting of Miscanthus and SRC in different ALC for GB after filtering for planting scenarios (Lovett et al., 2014). For the baseline scenario much of the unallocated SRC planting is in Lancashire on Grade 1 or 2 land

ES score Baseline Miscanthus Hectares; (% of planting) Ha per ES score Baseline SRC Hectares; (% of planting) Ha per ES score 2020 Miscanthus Hectares; (% of planting) Ha per ES score 2020 SRC Hectares; (% of planting) Ha per ES score
Total Planting ≥0 169 171 168 508 88 407 87 691 350 263 348 805 112 870 112 087
≥20 69 020 19 858 133 101 39 923
≥30 20 345 7469 36 670 18 307
Allocatable to Grade 4 ≥0 40 517; (23.95) 40 141 16 546; (18.72) 16 188 74 017; (21.13) 73 302 18 137; (16.07) 17 712
≥20 6567 947 10 176 2181
≥30 599 98 1154 551
Unallocated on Grade 4 128 654; (76.05) 71 861; (81.28) 276 246; (78.87) 94 733; (83.93)
Remainder Allocated to Grade 3 ≥0 106 575; (63.00) 106 442 55 959; (63.30) 55 702 220 295; (62.89) 219 945 73 927; (65.50) 73 606
≥20 49 879 10 667 90 553 25 356
≥30 15 077 2021 23 652 10 015
Unallocated on Grades 3 and 4 ≥0 22 079; (13.05) 21 925 15 902; (17.99) 15 801 55 951; (15.97) 55 558 20 806; (18.43) 20 769
≥20 12 574 8244 32 372 12 386
≥30 4669 5350 11 864 7741