Abstract
The blue and red shrimp, Aristeus antennatus, is a commercially important crustacean, in the Mediterranean Sea, which has been listed as a priority species for fishery management. Hypervariable microsatellite markers could be a useful tool to identify genetic stocks among geographically close fishing grounds. Potential microsatellite markers (97) identified from next-generation sequencing of an individual shrimp using a 454 GS Junior Pyrosequencer were tested on a preliminary panel of 15 individuals representing the four worldwide genetic stocks of the species from which 35 polymorphic loci were identified and used to characterize an additional 20 individuals from the Western Mediterranean Sea. In the Western Mediterranean sample, 32 out of 35 were polymorphic loci and the number of alleles per locus ranged from 2 to 14 and expected heterozygosity ranged from 0.050 to 0.968. No linkage disequilibrium was detected, indicating the independence of the loci. These novel microsatellites provide additional tools to address questions relating to genetic diversity, parentage studies and connectivity patterns of A. antennatus populations and help develop effective strategies to ensure long-term sustainability of this resource.
Keywords: Aristeus antennatus, Next-generation sequencing, Microsatellite loci, Population genetics, Genetic stocks, Blue and red shrimp
Introduction
The demersal blue and red shrimp Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816) (Crustacea, Decapoda) is distributed in the Mediterranean Sea, eastern Atlantic waters adjacent to Gibraltar Strait and the Indian Ocean from Mozambique to Zanzibar (Fernández et al., 2013 and references therein) and has been recorded recently from the Brazilian coast (Serejo et al., 2007). The species inhabits the muddy bottoms of the continental slope along submarine canyons, ranging from 80 to 3,300 m depth, making this the most eurybathic species in the Mediterranean Sea, and has a complex demographic structure in the water column (Sardà et al., 2010 and references therein). Populations in shallower waters (<1, 000 m depth) which are exploited by commercial fishing are mainly composed of large and mature females with a low but significant proportion of males that return to deeper grounds after mating takes place, principally in the summer. Populations in deeper waters (>1, 000 m depth), which are not fished, have lower abundances and biomasses and are mainly composed of males and juveniles (Sardà et al., 2010).
Exploited since the 1950s, the global catch has increased annually, reaching 1,851 tonnes in 2013 (FAO, 2015). Currently the focus of an important trawl fishery because of its high value in Mediterranean fish markets (60–120 $/kg), neither international conservation strategies nor worldwide sustainable management policies have been developed for this species despite priority listing for action by the Scientific Advisory Committee (SAC) of the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean Sea (FAO, 2006). An annual 60 days local closure in the fishing area of Palamós (Spanish Western Mediterranean) has been recently implemented, aimed at achieving the sustainable exploitation in this fishing ground (BOE, 2013).
Although studies have addressed A. antennatus biology and ecology, mainly of the Mediterranean populations (Fernández, 2012 and references therein), a major problem in achieving sustainable fisheries management is the identification of the biological units supporting the fishery, or the so-called genetic stocks (FAO, 1993). Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diversity analyses of blue and red shrimp populations on a broad oceanographic scale have detected four genetic stocks: the Western Mediterranean Sea (WM), the Eastern Mediterranean Sea (EM), the Atlantic Ocean (AO) and the Indian Ocean (IO), but have failed to distinguish genetic divergence within the regional level (Maggio et al., 2009; Roldán et al., 2009; Fernández et al., 2011; Marra et al., 2015). Surveys using a small number of microsatellites isolated using the FIASCO protocol (Zane, Bargelloni & Patarnello, 2002) failed to distinguish any type of population structure within Italian fishing grounds (Cannas et al., 2008; Cannas et al., 2012).
Nevertheless, microsatellites have proved their utility in identifying genetic stocks in marine penaeoid shrimps around the world (Benzie, 2000; Brooker et al., 2000; Supungul, Sootanan & Klinbunga, 2000; Ball & Chapman, 2003; Maggioni, Rogers & Maclean, 2003; Waqairatu et al., 2012; Abdul-Aziz et al., 2015) and it is possible that a greater number of these might provide higher resolution in other Mediterranean and Mozambique populations. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) based on 454 pyrosequencing has enabled a high-throughput approach and has demonstrated its usefulness in the development of SSRs in non-model organisms (Schoebel et al., 2013; Sousa-Santos, Fonseca & Amorim, 2015). Long reads generated by 454 sequencing are expected to contain SSRs and their flanking regions that are needed to develop methods for SSR screening among populations.
The aim of our study was the development and characterization of novel polymorphic microsatellite loci for A. antennatus to provide additional markers necessary to analyze the structure and connectivity of blue and red shrimp populations at smaller geographical scales both geographically and bathymetrically, but particularly within the Western Mediterranean, and to provide insights into this species’ reproductive behaviour through enabling parentage analysis.
Materials & Methods
DNA extraction for next-generation sequencing
Genomic DNA isolation was performed from 10 mg of muscle tissue stored in 95% ethanol of an individual (Blanes 2010; specimen-voucher: LIGUDG:Aa:872, stored at our laboratory) by means of two series of Sambrook, Fritsch & Maniatis (1989) phenol–chloroform extraction protocol, with minor modifications. The sample was treated between the series with 1 µl RNase A (20 mg/ml; Invitrogen ™, Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated at 37°C for 30 min. The high quality of extracted DNA was checked by resolution on a 0.8% agarose gel with ethidium bromide (0.5 mg/ml) and was quantified using both a NanoDrop ND-1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (136 ng/µl) and Picogreen reagent® (Thermo Fisher Scientific) (60 ng/µl) with a Paradigm Detection Platform (Beckman Coulter) (CEGEN-UPF Services).
Next-generation sequencing and De Novo assembly
Two shotgun whole-genome sequencing was performed on a Roche 454 GS Junior Pyrosequencer by Pompeu Fabra University’s Genomics Service (Barcelona, Spain). The reads obtained were assembled into contigs using the GS De Novo Assembler program included in the Newbler software package v.2.7. (Roche 454 Life Sciences 2006–2012; Roche, Bramfort, CT, USA) using the default settings with two modifications to take into account that A. antennatus is a diploid (heterozygoteMode: true), eukaryotic organism (largeGenome: true).
Microsatellite loci identification
To avoid redundancy with previous reported microsatellites, a BLASTn search employing our entire database and using a significance threshold of e-values <10−10 was performed against all published A. antennatus microsatellites (Cannas et al., 2008). All contigs matching with already available A. antennatus microsatellites were not included in the further microsatellite development. Remaining contigs were scanned with Tandem Repeats Finder v. 4.04 (Benson, 1999) to detect microsatellite motifs. Alignment parameters of match, mismatch and indels were set as 2, 7 and 7, respectively; minimum alignment score to report repeats was set to 30; maximum period size to 5 and matching and indel probabilities were set as 0.8 and 0.1, respectively. In addition, the option of flanking sequence was considered to record up to 500 nucleotides on each side of the repeat in order to later design specific PCR primers.
Contigs containing tandem repeats with at least 30 bp of flanking regions were used for primer design with Primer3 v. 0.4 (Untergrasser et al., 2012) using the following conditions: contiguous repeat areas that were less than 100 bp apart were considered the same locus (interrupted microsatellite), PCR product size ranged from 100 to 450 bp and PCR primers design followed the default general primer picking settings consisting of an optimal primer length of 20 bp (ranging between 18–27 bp), an optimal annealing temperature of 60°C (ranging between 57–63°C) and a GC content optimized between 20 and 80%.
Verification of putative microsatellites
Putative microsatellites were preliminarily screened for amplification success and polymorphism by genotyping a panel of 15 A. antennatus individuals representative of four geographic areas showing significant genetic divergences with mitochondrial markers: WM (n = 5), EM (n = 3), AO (n = 4) and IO (n = 3) (Fernández et al., 2011). For each individual, the total DNA extraction was conducted following the standard phenol-chloroform procedure (Sambrook, Fritsch & Maniatis, 1989). The approach of Schuelke (2000), which included three primers in a nested PCR, was conducted for SSR genotyping. For each locus, we used a non-labelled specific forward primer with a universal 19 bp 5′-M13 tail (5′-CACGACGTTGTAAAACGAC-3′), a non-labelled specific reverse primer and the universal fluorescently 6-FAM-labelled M13 as the third primer. This reduced genotyping costs because only a common fluorescently labelled primer was required for all putative microsatellite verifications.
Putative microsatellites were amplified in 20 µl of individual (singleplex) PCR reactions containing 0.5 U of EcoTaq DNA polymerase (Ecogen, Barcelona, Spain), 2 µl 10× PCR buffer, 0.6 µl MgCl2 (50 mM), 2 µl dNTP (10 mM), 0.2 µM of both reverse and 6-FAM-labeled M13 primers, 0.04 µM forward primer and 1µl DNA template (30–50 ng) plus ddH2O. PCR reactions were performed on a MJ Research PTC-200 thermal cycler (Bio-Rad, USA) under the following conditions: an initial denaturation at 92°C for 2 min; followed by 35 cycles of denaturation at 94°C for 30 s, annealing at the optimal temperature at 50°C or 60°C (Table 1) for 90 s and extension at 72°C for 90 s; followed by a final extension at 60°C for 30 min.
Table 1.
Locus name | Repeat motif | Primer sequence 5′–3′ | Ta (°C) | NA | Allele size | GenBank |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aa1a | (AG)7 | F: TTTCACGCATTTCTTGAACG | 50 | 4 | 455–461(455) | KU195267 |
R: GAGGAGCAGGGAGGTAGGTC | ||||||
Aa1b | (AACA)7 | F: GTGTAGTGTCGTCGGGACCT | 50 | 3 | 447–455(447) | KU195267 |
R: CCGTAGATCGGCCTGTACTT | ||||||
Aa60 | (TA)57 | F: TTTGCCTTGCGATTTTTACC | 60 | 3 | 197–313(307) | KU195268 |
R: TTTCGGTTTCCAGAATTTCG | ||||||
Aa123 | (AT)10 | F: TACATGCGTTGGGAACGATA | 60 | 6 | 444–454(448) | KU195269 |
R: GGTGGTTTGCTCCATGATTC | ||||||
Aa125 | (TA)8 | F: GACTCGCTCGCACACATAAA | 60 | 3 | 245–249(249) | KU195270 |
R: AAATCTGGGTGTGCAAGGTC | ||||||
Aa127 | (AC)15 | F: TTTTGACGGTGGATCAGACA | 60 | 4 | 351–373(371) | KU195271 |
R: GTGTGTGCGCAACTCTCG | ||||||
Aa138 | (AG)23 | F. ACCAGCTCTCAGAAGGCTCA | 50 | 11 | 217–249(231) | KU195272 |
R: TGTTTCTGAGTGTGGCAACC | ||||||
Aa173 | (TTTG)5 | F: CCCAAAGCTCTAGCAACGTC | 60 | 6 | 139–363(351) | KU195273 |
R: GAGAGGAGATCGGTCTGTCG | ||||||
Aa243 | (ATAC)5 | F: CACCTTCAACAGCACACACC | 60 | 3 | 352–360(356) | KU195274 |
R: CCTTCATGACCTTGGCAGTT | ||||||
Aa268 | (TTCAA)5 | F: GCTTTTTGCAGGGCATGTAT | 60 | 2 | 161–196(161) | KU195275 |
R: TGAGTCAGCTGCCACGAC | ||||||
Aa274 | (GTG)31 | F: CTTCCTGGAGACAGCACACA | 60 | 8 | 360–435(390) | KU195276 |
R: ACGACACCTGCATCACCATA | ||||||
Aa315 | (AGC)5 | F: CTTCCTGTGCTCTCCTGGAC | 60 | 2 | 417–423(423) | KU195277 |
R: TCTCCGCATCTTCTTCGTTT | ||||||
Aa421 | (AG)13 | F: CAAACTGGATCTCTTCGCCA | 60 | 7 | 197–251(205) | KU195278 |
R: GGCAACTTTGTAATCTCTGTTGTC | ||||||
Aa496a | (AAT)7 | F: AAAAGAAATAGGCCAGAACTGC | 60 | 2 | 168–171(171) | KU195279 |
R: GACGTTCCCTGGAGGTGTTA | ||||||
Aa496b | (AAC)5 | F: TCCAGGGAACGTCCTTACAC | 50 | 2 | 427–436(436) | KU195279 |
R: GAGCCTGAGATCTTGGGTGA | ||||||
Aa510 | (TCA)5 | F: GTGGTAGCGAAACCTTTGGA | 60 | 7 | 255–351(339) | KU195280 |
R: ACAAGCTCGAGCCACTGAAT | ||||||
Aa590 | (CTAAT)13 | F: CCTCCCTGACACCCTGTTTA | 50 | 5 | 393–523(408) | KU195281 |
R: CCAGCATAGCCTTGATTTGG | ||||||
Aa667 | (GAA)5 | F: GCAACTGAGAGCCACAGTCA | 50/60 | 3 | 269–275(272) | KU195282 |
R: TTCAGCACGACTCTGGATTG | ||||||
Aa681 | (CA)21 | F: AATTGCGAAACTTCCGACAC | 60 | 9 | 250–340(256) | KU195283 |
R: AAAAGACGCAGGGAAGGTCT | ||||||
Aa691 | (CT)9 | F: GGTTGCCAGAGCACGATAAT | 50 | 2 | 136–142(142) | KU195284 |
R: ACATCCGCATTCTCTTCGAC | ||||||
Aa751 | (AATTA)5 | F: GTGTGAATCGACCGGAATCT | 60 | 2 | 245–250(250) | KU195285 |
R: GCGACAAAAGTGATGACCAA | ||||||
Aa785 | (AAG)6 | F: TATTTTTCCCTGGCTTGCAC | 60 | 5 | 375–477(459) | KU195286 |
R: ACCAGGCAGCCAGTCTATGT | ||||||
Aa818 | (CAATT)5 | F: GCGATCACTGAACAGGAATG | 60 | 3 | 189–209(194) | KU195287 |
R: TGGGTAAGTCCTAATGGACTGG | ||||||
Aa867 | (AAC)7 | F: GGCTTTCGATTGATGTTGGT | 50 | 3 | 147–153(150) | KU195288 |
R: TAGCCCCTGAGTGTGTGATG | ||||||
Aa956 | (AGAT)6 | F: CTTGCACATAACGCAGGTGT | 50 | 3 | 219–231(231) | KU195289 |
R: CGCATGTTGTGTTGATTTCG | ||||||
Aa1061 | (AG)7 | F: ACCGGCACTAGGTTGGACTA | 60 | 4 | 208–224(212) | KU195290 |
R: CGGACCATGAGCTTTCAAAT | ||||||
Aa1129 | (CAT)10 | F: TCAGGTGTGAGAGCAGGTTG | 60 | 2 | 210–213(213) | KU195291 |
R: TTAATGACCATGGCTTGTGC | ||||||
Aa1169 | (CAG)5 | F: TGTCACGCTTCCCAACACTA | 60 | 3 | 243–261(261) | KU195292 |
R: CTGCCTCCTGCAGCTGTATT | ||||||
Aa1195 | (AGC)33 | F: GGGGAGGAGCAGAGACAGTA | 60 | 4 | 213–222(219) | KU195293 |
R: ACGCTGTTACCTCGGCTTTA | ||||||
Aa1222 | (TTCA)6 | F: CGTTCGTCCTTTCTTTCCAC | 60 | 3 | 160–172(168) | KU195294 |
R: TTGTCTGCTCTTCCTATGTTGC | ||||||
Aa1255 | (AT)17 | F: TGTCACGTTTGGGTTTCTGA | 50 | 5 | 144–158(158) | KU195295 |
R: GCCGTGGTGGAATTTATCAT | ||||||
Aa1408 | (ATTT)5 | F: CCAGCCATACTCTGTCACCA | 50/60 | 3 | 171–187(183) | KU195296 |
R: TTTTGAGCGGGAAGTCATTC | ||||||
Aa1444 | (AT)10 | F: TTTGGAGAGTGGTTTGCTCA | 60 | 7 | 197–211(199) | KU195297 |
R: GCCATCACCACAACAACAG | ||||||
Aa1450 | (AG)7 | F: TCGGGAAGACGCTTCTTTTA | 60 | 3 | 205–287(207) | KU195298 |
R: AGAACACCCTGCCCTTACAT | ||||||
Aa1690 | (TTGA)5 | F: AGGACGACACTGTGTGTGGA | 60 | 2 | 112–152(152) | KU195299 |
R: TCTGCCAAGTTGAAACATCTG |
Notes.
Ta, annealing temperature; NA, number of alleles; allele size range (size of sequenced allele); GenBank accession number of the sequenced allele. Forward primers were tailed with M13 at 5′ and allele size range included 19 bp of M13.
Subsequently, 2 µl of amplified product was added to 10 µl of Hi-Di™ formamide with 0.1 µl of GeneScan™ 500 LIZ size standard and were loaded on to an ABI PRISM 3130 Genetic Analyzer (Applied Biosystems). Finally, allele scoring, after manually checking, was performed using Geneious v7.1.9 (Kearse et al., 2012).
Data analysis
In order to assess the usefulness for population genetics studies, all loci yielding reliable polymorphism were further evaluated by genotyping 20 individuals collected from the same WM locality (Blanes) used in the preliminary screening. For each locus, observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE) and inbreeding coefficient (FIS) were estimated with Genepop v4.2.2 (Rousset, 2008) using allele identity. For loci where at least 70% of individuals were genotyped, departures from Hardy-Weinberg expectations (HWE) and linkage disequilibrium for each pair of loci were also tested using Genepop v4.2.2 (Rousset, 2008). Significance level was adjusted using Bonferroni correction for multiple testing. Micro-Checker (Van Oosterhout et al., 2004) was used to check for the presence of null alleles, stuttering or allele dropout in loci that presented significant departure from HWE. In addition, the combined non-exclusion probability test was conducted with Cervus v3.0.3 (Kalinowski, Taper & Marshall, 2007) to check for efficiency of these loci for inferring parentage analysis.
Results and Discussion
Next-generation sequencing and De Novo assembly
During the last decade, 454 pyrosequencing technology has been used widely to develop microsatellites in non-model organisms (Leese et al., 2012; Schoebel et al., 2013), as it is faster and more cost-effective than the previous methodologies (e.g., FIASCO protocol). The shotgun whole-genome sequencing with a Roche 454 pyrosequencer on the A. antennatus genome produced 165,507 reads with an average length of 343 bp (56,772,861 bp in total). Comparatively, the number of reads and total bp sequenced conforms to the values obtained by Leese et al. (2012) for other crustaceans, including decapods, using the same type of approach (49,802–186,890 and 12,098,817–55,152,741, respectively). Our average read length was clearly above the range of previous crustacean studies (211.5–265.5 bp). Up to 10,613 of the obtained reads were assembled into 2,029 contigs covering 895,246 bp of the A. antennatus genome and the number of singletons was 128,835. These contigs had an average length of 873 bp (range: 100–12,986 bp) and N50 contig size was 858 bp.
Microsatellite loci identification and development
No homology with already available A. antennatus microsatellites was found in the BLASTn search, except for our contig00595 that matched the microsatellite Ant93 described in Cannas et al. (2008) (GenBank accession number EU417952).
In 247 contigs, a total of 317 tandem repeats were identified with Tandem Repeats Finder of which 241 presented motifs with a period size of di-(31%), tri-(27%), tetra-(24%) or penta-nucleotides (18%), repeated at least 5 times. The di-, tri- and tetra-nucleotides are the most common repeat motifs for microsatellite loci described in decapod shrimps (Scarbrough, Cowles & Carter, 2002), the di-nucleotides being the most abundant of them (Meehan et al., 2003; Robainas, Espinosa & García-Machado, 2003; Pan et al., 2004; Zeng et al., 2013; Baranski et al., 2014).
One hundred and ten of the putative microsatellite markers presented a minimum of 30 flanking bp, likely useful for primer design and Primer 3 software suggested specific primer pairs for 97 of these markers. These results were in the range observed in previous searches undertaken on crustaceans including decapods (25–1,420 putative markers) when stringent filters were used on massive 454 sequencing datasets (Leese et al., 2012). From the preliminary evaluation, 93 out of 97 microsatellites have amplified PCR products. After discarding primer pairs producing unexpected size fragments for microsatellite loci or which were monomorphic, 35 markers yielded reliable microsatellite variation with a total of 144 alleles ranging from 2 to 11 alleles per locus with an average of 4.1 (Table 1). Sequences of the contigs including these polymorphic markers were submitted to GenBank (Accession Numbers: KU195267 –KU195299) (Table 1 and Table S1). The proportion of success (36%) in detecting polymorphic loci for putative microsatellite markers was consistent to that achieved in decapods (15%–68%) (Meehan et al., 2003; Dao, Todd & Jerry, 2013; Dambach et al., 2013; Miller et al., 2013), in other marine species (e.g., 29% in a mollusk (Pardo et al., 2011) and also in fishes (∼40%; Sousa-Santos, Fonseca & Amorim, 2015; Williams et al., 2015)).
Population genetic analysis
Of the 35 initial loci, 32 were polymorphic in the Western Mediterranean sample analysed with a mean number of alleles per locus of 4.8 (2–14) and a mean observed and expected heterozygosity of 0.350 (0.000–1.000) and 0.521 (0.050–0.968), respectively (Table 2). The number of alleles detected in our study resembled that previously shown in the Italian study (3–13; Cannas et al., 2008), but our estimates of observed and expected heterozygosity were broader than 0.2–0.85 and 0.23–0.89 in Cannas et al. (2008). In decapod shrimps, levels of polymorphism are usually high, with abundant alleles and often heterozygosity levels close to 1.0 (Scarbrough, Cowles & Carter, 2002).
Table 2.
Locus name | P | NA | Allele size | Ho | HE | FIS | P-value | Null allele frequency |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aa1a | 95 | 4 | 455–463 | 0.684 | 0.643 | −0.064 | 0.0947 | |
Aa1b | 100 | 2 | 447–451 | 0.300 | 0.434 | 0.309 | 0.2804 | |
Aa60 | 5 | 1 | 307 | 0.000 | 0.000 | – | – | |
Aa123 | 100 | 5 | 444–452 | 0.700 | 0.645 | −0.086 | 0.2435 | |
Aa125 | 50 | 3 | 245–249 | 0.200 | 0.589 | 0.660 | – | |
Aa127 a | 70 | 4 | 351–375 | 0.214 | 0.679 | 0.684 | 0.0016* | 0.259 |
Aa138 | 100 | 14 | 213–249 | 0.750 | 0.921 | 0.186 | 0.0414 | |
Aa173 | 85 | 4 | 131–351 | 0.177 | 0.276 | 0.360 | 0.0694 | |
Aa243 | 100 | 5 | 352–376 | 0.500 | 0.458 | −0.092 | 0.4902 | |
Aa268 | 10 | 1 | 161 | 0.000 | 0.000 | – | – | |
Aa274 | 65 | 12 | 363–468 | 0.231 | 0.968 | 0.762 | – | |
Aa315 | 100 | 2 | 417–423 | 1.000 | 0.500 | −1.000 | 0.0000* | – |
Aa421 a | 95 | 7 | 197–261 | 0.211 | 0.816 | 0.742 | 0.0000* | 0.319 |
Aa496a | 95 | 3 | 162–171 | 0.316 | 0.477 | 0.337 | 0.0194 | |
Aa496b | 100 | 2 | 427–436 | 0.450 | 0.355 | −0.267 | 0.5283 | |
Aa510 | 85 | 6 | 255–351 | 0.235 | 0.502 | 0.531 | 0.0070 | |
Aa590 | 85 | 3 | 398–523 | 0.471 | 0.443 | −0.062 | 1.0000 | |
Aa667 | 100 | 5 | 260–275 | 0.650 | 0.732 | 0.112 | 0.1706 | |
Aa681 | 100 | 11 | 250–340 | 0.650 | 0.800 | 0.188 | 0.2607 | |
Aa691 | 95 | 3 | 140–144 | 0.263 | 0.240 | −0.098 | 1.0000 | |
Aa751 | 100 | 2 | 245–250 | 0.200 | 0.390 | 0.487 | 0.0540 | |
Aa785 | 95 | 7 | 375–486 | 0.316 | 0.564 | 0.440 | 0.0117 | |
Aa818 a | 100 | 7 | 184–214 | 0.250 | 0.715 | 0.650 | 0.0000* | 0.258 |
Aa867 | 100 | 2 | 150–153 | 0.000 | 0.100 | 1.000 | 0.0256 | |
Aa956 | 100 | 4 | 219–231 | 0.650 | 0.672 | 0.033 | 0.8058 | |
Aa1061 a | 100 | 5 | 208–226 | 0.250 | 0.703 | 0.644 | 0.0000* | 0.253 |
Aa1129 | 100 | 2 | 210–213 | 0.050 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 1.0000 | |
Aa1169 | 55 | 2 | 249–261 | 0.000 | 0.182 | 1.000 | – | |
Aa1195 | 100 | 3 | 213–219 | 0.600 | 0.615 | 0.024 | 0.8929 | |
Aa1222 | 100 | 2 | 168–172 | 0.050 | 0.050 | 0.000 | 1.0000 | |
Aa1255 a | 90 | 6 | 144–158 | 0.222 | 0.672 | 0.669 | 0.0009* | 0.255 |
Aa1408 | 100 | 3 | 171–187 | 0.200 | 0.190 | −0.056 | 1.0000 | |
Aa1444 a | 95 | 9 | 197–221 | 0.3158 | 0.771 | 0.590 | 0.0000* | 0.243 |
Aa1450 | 55 | 3 | 205–209 | 0.091 | 0.527 | 0.828 | – | |
Aa1690 | 100 | 1 | 152 | 0.000 | 0.000 | – | – |
Notes.
P, Proportion of amplified individuals (%); NA, number of alleles; allele size range including 19 bp of M13; HE, expected heterozygosity; FIS, inbreeding coefficient; HWE, P-value.
Significant departure from HWE for the loci with P ≥ 70% (see text).
Locus with signs of null allele.
Among the 32 polymorphic loci, no linkage disequilibrium was detected after Bonferroni correction (P = 0.0001), suggesting their independent segregation. In 28 out of 32 polymorphic loci, proper amplification was obtained for more than 70% of the analysed specimens (N = 20). In 21 out of 28 the polymorphic loci, genotype proportions were consistent with HWE expectations after Bonferroni correction (P = 0.0018), with a mean number of alleles per locus of 4.4 and a mean expected heterozygosity of 0.455, which are in line with those obtained by Cannas et al. (2008) in 9 loci (5.3 and 0.637, respectively). Micro-Checker revealed null alleles (non-amplified alleles by PCR due mainly to mutations in flanking regions) as likely involved in significant heterozygote deficiency (positive FIS values, see Table 2) observed in six loci. In addition, stuttering in two loci (Aa818 and Aa1444) contributed to genotype scoring errors. In most studies in other decapods, significant departures from HWE resulted in positive FIS values (Supungul, Sootanan & Klinbunga, 2000; Ball & Chapman, 2003; Pan et al., 2004; Cannas et al., 2008; Dambach et al., 2013; Miller et al., 2013). Despite the majority of these authors arguing that the most probable reason for HWE departures was the presence of null alleles; this suggestion was only tested and confirmed by one study (Miller et al., 2013). In regard to Aa315locus in this study, all the analyzed individuals showed the same heterozygote genotype, and Micro-Checker failed to detect any genotyping error. It may be that, this is indicative of two duplicate regions; with no variation within regions but different fixed allele when compared (Moen et al., 2008).
The application of microsatellite markers also has proven its utility to study mating systems and paternity in decapod shrimps (Bilodeau, Felder & Neigel, 2005). In our study, using the 21 loci under HWE to test their potential in parentage analysis, the combined exclusion probability in parentage assignment was 0.9786 for a candidate parent when parents were unknown and the combined exclusion probability for the identity of two unrelated individuals was 0.9999. Thus, these results indicate the effectiveness of these loci for future parentage studies in natural populations of A. antennatus.
Conclusions
Massive sequencing by a 454 pyrosequencing platform of the A. antennatus genome has allowed the development, validation and characterization of 35 new polymorphic microsatellite loci which greatly increases the number of available microsatellites from the eight microsatellites previously described (Cannas et al., 2008). This larger set of loci will provide a stronger set of tools to: (i) perform parentage studies, and (ii) examine connectivity patterns (horizontal and vertical) including examining the population structure of this species at a variety of geographical scales and, particularly, between fished populations in shallow waters and deeper unfished populations. This contribution will also assist to the responsible and sustainable management of this exploited marine resource, by means of a feasible strategy of temporal genetic monitoring.
Supplemental Information
Acknowledgments
The authors thank MV Fernández and C Melià for their assistance in the DNA extraction. Authors are also indebted to JA Benzie for valuable comments on the manuscript and for revision of the English language.
Funding Statement
This work was supported by grants by the Spanish Government (AGL2009-09228 and CTM2014-54648-C2-2-R) and Ajuntament de Palamós, Spain (Beca Coopoerativa La Equitativa 2013–2014) to MIR. LP benefited from predoctoral fellowship from the Universitat de Girona (BR2014), Spain. IC benefited from a 6 months fellowship from Regione Toscana, Italy, during her stay in Girona. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Additional Information and Declarations
Competing Interests
The authors declare there are no competing interests.
Author Contributions
Sandra Heras conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Laia Planella performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Ilaria Caldarazzo performed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools.
Manuel Vera and José-Luis García-Marín conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, reviewed drafts of the paper.
Maria Ines Roldán conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, reviewed drafts of the paper.
DNA Deposition
Data Availability
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data has been supplied as Table S1.
References
- Abdul-Aziz et al. (2015).Abdul-Aziz MA, Schöfl G, Mrotzek G, Haryanti H, Sugama K, Saluz HP. Population structure of the Indonesian giant tiger shrimp Penaeus monodon: a window into evolutionary similarities between paralogous mitochondrial DNA sequences and their genomes. Ecology and Evolution. 2015;5:3570–3584. doi: 10.1002/ece3.1616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Ball & Chapman (2003).Ball AO, Chapman RW. Population genetic analysis of white shrimp, Litopenaeus setiferus, using microsatellite genetic markers. Molecular Ecology. 2003;12:2319–2330. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01922.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Baranski et al. (2014).Baranski M, Gopikrishna G, Robinson NA, Katneni VK, Shekhar MS, Shanmugakarthik J, Jothivel S, Gopal C, Ravichandran P, Kent M, Arnyasi M, Ponniah AG. The development of a high density linkage map for black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) based on cSNPs. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e2200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0085413. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benson (1999).Benson G. Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Research. 1999;27:573–580. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.2.573. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Benzie (2000).Benzie JA. Population genetic structure in penaeid prawns. Aquaculture Research. 2000;31:95–119. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2109.2000.00412.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Bilodeau, Felder & Neigel (2005).Bilodeau AL, Felder DL, Neigel JE. Multiple paternity in the thalassinidean ghost shrimp, Callichirus islagrande (Crustacea: Decapoda: Callianassidae) Marine Biology. 2005;146:381–385. doi: 10.1007/s00227-004-1444-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE).Boletín Oficial del Estado (BOE) Orden AAA/923/2013, de 16 de mayo, por la que se regula la pesca de gamba rosada (Aristeus antennatus) con arte de arrastre de fondo en determinadas zonas marítimas próximas a Palamós. 2013. Sección III. 126, 40016–40022. https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2013/05/27/pdfs/BOE.-A-2013-5555.pdf .
- Brooker et al. (2000).Brooker AL, Benzie JAH, Blair D, Versini JJ. Population structure of the giant tiger prawn Penaeus monodon in Australian waters, determined using microsatellite markers. Marine Biology. 2000;136:149–157. doi: 10.1007/s002270050017. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Cannas et al. (2008).Cannas R, Buccoli S, Sacco F, Marcias S, Savadori S, Cau AM, Deiana A. Isolation and characterization of 14 polymorphic microsatellite markers for the blue and red shrimp, Aristeus antennatus (Crustacea, Decapoda) Molecular Ecology Resources. 2008;8:1420–1422. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2008.02183.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cannas et al. (2012).Cannas R, Sacco F, Follesa MC, Sabatini A, Arculeo M, Lo Brutto S, Maggio T, Deiana AM, Cau A. Genetic variability of the blue and red shrimp Aristeus antennatus in the Western Mediterranean Sea inferred by DNA microsatellite loci. Marine Ecology. 2012;33:350–363. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2011.00504.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Dambach et al. (2013).Dambach J, Raupach MJ, Mayer C, Schwarzer J, Leese F. Isolation and characterization of nine polymorphic microsatellite markers for the deep-sea shrimp Nematocarcinus lanceopes (Crustacea: Decapoda: Caridea) BMC Research Notes. 2013;6:75. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-6-75. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Dao, Todd & Jerry (2013).Dao HT, Todd EV, Jerry DR. Characterization of polymorphic microsatellite loci for the spiny lobster Panulirus spp. and their utility to be applied to other Panulirus lobsters. Conservation Genetics Resources. 2013;5:43–46. doi: 10.1007/s12686-012-9728-0. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- FAO (1993).Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) FAO Fisheries Report 491. FAO; Rome: 1993. Report of the expert consultation on utilization and conservation of aquatic genetic resources. [Google Scholar]
- FAO (2006).Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) FAO Fisheries Report 814. FAO; Rome: 2006. General fisheries commission for the Mediterranean; report of the ninth session of the scientific advisory committee. [Google Scholar]
- FAO (2015).Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Species fact sheets. 2015. http://www.fao.org/fishery/species/3422/en. [10 October 2015]. http://www.fao.org/fishery/species/3422/en
- Fernández (2012).Fernández MV. Doctoral thesis. 2012. Pylogeographical analyses of two aristeid shrimps, Aristeus antennatus and Aristaeomorpha foliacea (Crustacea, Aristeidae), with implications for resource conservation. UdG. 172pp. [Google Scholar]
- Fernández et al. (2011).Fernández MV, Heras S, Maltagliati F, Turco A, Roldán MI. Genetic structure in the blue and red shrimp Aristeus antennatus and the role played by hydrographical and oceanographical barriers. Marine Ecology Progress Series. 2011;421:163–171. doi: 10.3354/meps08881. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Fernández et al. (2013).Fernández MV, Heras S, Viñas J, Maltagliati F, Roldán MI. Multilocus comparative phylogeography of two Aristeid shrimps of high commercial interest (Aristeus antennatus and Aristaeomorpha foliacea) reveals different responses to past environmental changes. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(3):e2200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0059033. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kalinowski, Taper & Marshall (2007).Kalinowski ST, Taper ML, Marshall TC. Revising how the computer program CERVUS accommodates genotyping error increases success in paternity assignment. Molecular Ecology. 2007;16:1099–1006. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2007.03089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kearse et al. (2012).Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, Buxton S, Cooper A, Markowitz S, Duran C, Thierer T, Ashton B, Mentjies P, Drummond A. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:1647–1649. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts199. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Leese et al. (2012).Leese F, Brand P, Rozenberg A, Mayer C, Agrawal S, Dambach J, Dietz L, Doemel JS, Goodall-Copstake WP, Held C, Jackson JA, Lampert KP, Linse K, Macher JN, Nolzen J, Raupach MJ, Rivera NT, Schubart DC, Striewski S, Tollrian R, Sands CJ. Exploring Pandora’s box: potential and pitfalls of low coverage genome surveys for evolutionary biology. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e2200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0049202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Maggio et al. (2009).Maggio T, Lo Brutto S, Cannas R, Deiana AM, Arculeo M. Environmental features of deep-sea habitats linked to the genetic population structure of a crustacean species in the Mediterranean Sea. Marine Ecology. 2009;30:354–365. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0485.2008.00277.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Maggioni, Rogers & Maclean (2003).Maggioni R, Rogers AD, Maclean N. Population structure of Litopenaeus schmitti (Decapoda: Penaeidae) from the Brazilian coast identified using six polymorphic microsatellite loci. Molecular Ecology. 2003;12:3213–3217. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-294X.2003.01987.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Marra et al. (2015).Marra A, Mona S, Sà RM, D’Onghia G, Maiorano P. Population genetic history of Aristeus antennatus (Crustacea: Decapoda) in the Western and Central Mediterranean Sea. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e2200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0117272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Meehan et al. (2003).Meehan D, Xu Z, Zuniga G, Alcivar-Warren A. High frequency and large number of polymorphic microsatellites in cultured shrimp, Penaeus (Litopenaeus) vannamei (Crustacea:Decapoda) Marine Biotechnology. 2003;5:311–330. doi: 10.1007/s10126-002-0092-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Miller et al. (2013).Miller AD, Van Rooyen A, Sweeney OF, Whiterod NS, Weeks AR. The development of 10 novel polymorphic microsatellite markers through next generation sequencing and a preliminary population genetic analysis for the endangered Glenelg spiny crayfish, Eustacus bispinosus. Molecular Biology Reports. 2013;40:4415–4419. doi: 10.1007/s11033-013-2531-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moen et al. (2008).Moen T, Hayes B, Nilsen F, Delghandi M, Fjalestad KT, Fevolden SE, Berg PR, Lien S. Identification and characterisation of novel SNP markers in Atlantic cod: evidence for directional selection. BMC Genetics. 2008;9:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-9-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pan et al. (2004).Pan YW, Chou HH, You EM, Yu HT. Isolation and characterization of 23 polymorphic microsatellite markers for diversity and stock analysis in tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) Molecular Ecology Notes. 2004;4:345–347. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00692.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pardo et al. (2011).Pardo BG, Vera M, Pino-Querido A, Alvarez-Dios JA, Martínez P. Development of microsatellite loci in the mediterranean mussel, Mytilus galloprovincialis. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2011;11:586–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-0998.2011.03004.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Robainas, Espinosa & García-Machado (2003).Robainas A, Espinosa G, García-Machado E. Characterization of the Pink shrimp Farfantenaeus notialis (Crustacea, Decapoda) microsatellite DNA. Revista de Investigaciones Marítimas. 2003;24:161–164. [Google Scholar]
- Roldán et al. (2009).Roldán MI, Heras S, Patellani R, Maltagliati F. Analysis of genetic structure of the red shrimps Aristeus antennatus from the western Mediterranean employing two mitochondrial regions. Genetica. 2009;136:1–4. doi: 10.1007/s10709-008-9330-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Rousset (2008).Rousset F. Genepop’007: a complete reimplementation of the Genepop software for Windows and Linux. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2008;8:103–106. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01931.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sambrook, Fritsch & Maniatis (1989).Sambrook J, Fritsch EF, Maniatis T. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 2nd edition Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; New York: 1989. [Google Scholar]
- Sardà et al. (2010).Sardà F, Roldán MI, Heras S, Maltagliati M. Influence of the genetic structure of the red and blue shrimp, Aristeus antennatus (Risso, 1816) on the sustainability of a deep-sea population along a depth gradient in the Western Mediterranean. Scientia Marina. 2010;74:569–575. doi: 10.3989/scimar.2010.74n3569. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Scarbrough, Cowles & Carter (2002).Scarbrough JR, Cowles DL, Carter RL. Microsatellites in shrimp species. In: Escobar-Briones E, Alvarez F, editors. Modern approaches to the study of Crustacea. Kluwer Academic and Plenum Publishers; New York: 2002. pp. 291–299. [Google Scholar]
- Schoebel et al. (2013).Schoebel CN, Brodbeck S, Buehler D, Cornejo C, Gajurel J, Hartikainen H, Keller D, Leys M, Ricanova S, Segelbacher G, Werth S, Csencsics D. Lessons learned from microsatellite development for nonmodel organisms using 454 pyrosequencing. Journal of Evolutionary Biology. 2013;26:600–611. doi: 10.1111/jeb.12077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Schuelke (2000).Schuelke M. An economic method for the fluorescent labeling of PCR fragments. Nature Biotechnology. 2000;18:233–234. doi: 10.1038/72708. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Serejo et al. (2007).Serejo CS, Young PS, Cardoso IC, Tavares C, Rodrigues C, Almeida TC. Abundância, diversidade e zonação dos crustáceos no talude da costa central do Brasil (11°–22°S) coletados pelo Programa REVIZEE/Score Central: prospecção pesqueira. In: Costa PAS, Olavo G, Martins AS, editors. Biodiversidade da fauna marinha profunda na costa central brasileira. Museu Nacional; Rio de Janeiro: 2007. pp. 133–162. [Google Scholar]
- Sousa-Santos, Fonseca & Amorim (2015).Sousa-Santos C, Fonseca PJ, Amorim MCP. Development and characterization of novel microsatellite loci for Lusitanian toadfish, Halobatrachus didactylus. PeerJ. 2015;3:e2200. doi: 10.7717/peerj.731. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Supungul, Sootanan & Klinbunga (2000).Supungul P, Sootanan P, Klinbunga S. Microsatellite polymorphism and the population structure of the black tiger shrimp (P. monodon) in Thailand. Marine Biotechnology. 2000;2:339–347. doi: 10.1007/s101260000012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Untergrasser et al. (2012).Untergrasser A, Cutcutache I, Koressaar T, Ye J, Faircloth BC, Remm M, Rozen SG. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces. Nucleic Acids Research. 2012;40:e2200. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks596. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Van Oosterhout et al. (2004).Van Oosterhout C, Hutchison WF, Shipley P, Wills DPM. Micro-Checker: software for identifying and correcting genotyping errors in microsatellite data. Molecular Ecology Notes. 2004;4:535–538. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00684.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Waqairatu et al. (2012).Waqairatu SS, Dierens L, Cowley JA, Dixon TJ, Johnson KN, Barnes AC, Li Y. Genetic analysis of black tiger shrimp (Penaeus monodon) across its natural distribution range reveals more recent colonization of Fiji and other South Pacific islands. Ecology and Evolution. 2012;2:2057–2071. doi: 10.1002/ece3.316. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Williams et al. (2015).Williams SM, Pepperell JG, Corley SW, Ovenden JR. Isolation and characterisation of 18 polymorphic microsatellite loci for black marlin (Istiompax indica) and their utility for Pacific billfish. Fisheries Research. 2015;166:29–32. doi: 10.1016/j.fishres.2014.07.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Zane, Bargelloni & Patarnello (2002).Zane L, Bargelloni L, Patarnello T. Strategies for microsatellite isolation: a review. Molecular Ecology. 2002;11:1–16. doi: 10.1046/j.0962-1083.2001.01418.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Zeng et al. (2013).Zeng D, Chen X, Xie D, Zhao Y, Yang C, Li Y, Ma N, Peng M, Yang Q, Liao Z, Wang H, Chen X. Transcriptome analysis of pacific white shrimp (Litopenaeus vanammei) hepatopancreas in response to Taura Syndrome Virus (TSV) experimental infection. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e2200. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057515. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The following information was supplied regarding data availability:
The raw data has been supplied as Table S1.