Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 26;26(7):477–487. doi: 10.1002/env.2348

Table 3.

The table displays the bias, root mean square error (RMSE, both as a percentage of the true value) and the coverage probabilities for the pollution–health relationship estimated by the naïve ecological model (4) and the aggregate model (5), as both the true risk and the within‐area variation in pollution vary under different assumptions about Eki*

Risk (α) Pollution Bias RMSE Coverage
Model (4) Model (5) Model (4) Model (5) Model (4) Model (5)
Constant Eki*
1.05 SD = 1, independent −0.31 −0.29 6.06 6.08 95.3 95.5
1.05 SD = 1, linear −0.16 −0.22 5.85 5.83 96.2 96.4
1.05 SD = 10, independent 0.11 0.10 5.69 5.67 95.7 95.5
1.05 SD = 10, linear 0.45 −0.17 5.81 5.74 94.8 95.6
1.5 SD = 1, independent −0.22 −0.34 14.06 13.92 95.4 94.4
1.5 SD = 1, linear 17.96 0.47 23.00 10.56 73.4 95.4
1.5 SD = 10, independent −1.17 −0.64 7.87 5.35 92.6 94.3
1.5 SD = 10, linear 20.72 −0.09 23.57 2.37 44.6 95.9
Variable Eki*
1.05 SD = 1, independent −0.07 −0.06 5.79 5.80 95.4 95.6
1.05 SD = 1, linear 0.40 0.33 5.80 5.78 94.8 94.4
1.05 SD = 10, independent 0.25 0.23 5.65 5.64 95.6 95.6
1.05 SD = 10, linear 0.91 0.26 5.71 5.54 95.0 95.0
1.5 SD = 1, independent 0.18 0.35 14.71 13.34 95.0 96.2
1.5 SD = 1, linear 17.21 −0.46 22.75 10.19 73.0 94.2
1.5 SD = 10, independent −0.70 −0.44 8.61 4.47 91.4 96.0
1.5 SD = 10, linear 21.33 −0.02 24.98 2.04 46.6 97.0