Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 26;26(7):477–487. doi: 10.1002/env.2348

Table 4.

Estimated relative risks and 95% uncertainty intervals (confidence intervals for Model‐GLM and credible intervals for the remaining models) for 5‐μg m−3 (NO2) and 1‐μg m−3 (PM2.5 and PM10) increases in pollution concentrations from the models considered in this paper

Model Pollutant
NO2 PM2.5 PM10
Main results
Model‐GLM 1.085 (1.052, 1.118) 1.032 (1.005, 1.060) 1.008 (0.989, 1.027)
Model‐CAR 1.094 (1.055, 1.133) 1.055 (1.022, 1.094) 1.037 (1.014, 1.062)
Model‐Local 1.089 (1.071, 1.104) 1.032 (1.017, 1.047) 1.013 (1.003, 1.023)
Model‐Local‐Agg 1.086 (1.072, 1.100) 1.035 (1.021, 1.054) 1.010 (1.001, 1.019)
Model‐HH 1.088 (1.086, 1.091) 1.046 (1.044, 1.047) 1.019 (1.017, 1.020)
Model‐LM 1.091 (1.077, 1.105) 1.047 (1.033, 1.060) 1.033 (1.023, 1.043)
Sensitivity analysis
G = 3 1.084 (1.065, 1.105) 1.035 (1.021, 1.051) 1.008 (0.999, 1.017)
a = 0.1,b = 0.1 1.085 (1.071, 1.110) 1.035 (1.024, 1.047) 1.010 (1.002, 1.020)
a = 0.5,b = 0.0005 1.084 (1.068, 1.099) 1.034 (1.022, 1.046) 1.010 (1.002, 1.018)
No population weighting 1.089 (1.073, 1.105) 1.030 (1.017, 1.046) 1.010 (1.001, 1.026)