Skip to main content
. 2016 May 31;50(14):844–852. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2016-096268

Table 2.

PEDro quality assessment of included RCTs

Study Score per PEDro item Total score
i* ii iii iv v vi vii viii ix x xi
Exercise therapy
Ferber et al37 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 5
Combined intervention
Mason et al38 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 4
Rathleff et al39 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 7
Foot orthoses
Lewinson et al40 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 1 1 5
Mills et al41 1 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9
Patellar taping and bracing
Osorio et al42 1 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 4
Other adjunctive interventions
Hains and Hains43 0 1 1 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 9

i=eligibility criteria; ii=random allocation; iii=concealed allocation; iv=baseline comparability; v=blind subjects; vi=blind therapists; vii=blind assessors; viii=adequate follow-up; ix intention-to-treat analysis; x=between-group comparisons; xi=point estimates and variability.

*Eligibility criteria item does not contribute to total score.

0, no or unable to determine; 1, yes; PEDro, Physiotherapy Evidence Database; RCTs, randomised controlled trials.