Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 24;25(8):595–603. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-004536

Table 4.

Associations between clinically important report changes and characteristics of examinations, patients and readers

Variable n Logistic regression analysis
Univariate Multivariate (n=1055)
OR 95% CI p Value OR 95% CI p Value
Examination
 Urgency (urgent referral* vs not†) 1071 2.0 1.3 to 3.1 0.001 1.6 1.0 to 2.5 0.05
 Examination time (out of working hours‡ vs during†) 1071 1.8 1.3 to 2.6 0.001
 Time of first reading (out of working hours‡ vs during†) 1055 1.6 1.1 to 2.3 0.01
 Time of second reading (out of working hours‡ vs during†) 1061 0.8 0.5 to 1.3 0.4
Patient
 Age (increase of 10 years) 1071 1.1 1.0 to 1.2 0.2
 Gender (female vs male†) 1071 0.8 0.6 to 1.1 0.2
 Admission status (inpatients vs outpatients†) 1071 1.8 1.1 to 2.9 0.03
First reader, gender (female vs male†) 1071 1.1 0.8 to 1.6 0.6
First reader subspecialty 1064 <0.001 0.001
 Inexperienced consultant† 408 1.0 1.0
 General radiologist 202 0.4 0.2 to 0.7 0.001 0.6 0.4 to 1.7 0.7
 Abdominal radiologist 383 0.5 0.3 to 0.8 0.001 0.4 0.3 to 0.6 <0.001
 Other subspecialty 71 1.0 0.5 to 1.9 0.9 1.1 0.6 to 2.2 0.7
Second reader, gender (female vs male†) 1071 1.0 0.7 to 1.4 0.9
Second reader subspecialty 1062 <0.001 0.002
 Inexperienced consultant† 222 1.0 1.0
 General radiologist 235 0.3 0.2 to 0.6 <0.001 0.3 0.2 to 0.7 0.002
 Abdominal radiologist 535 0.8 0.6 to 1.3 0.4 1.1 0.7 to 1.7 0.7
 Other subspecialty 70 0.2 0.1 to 0.6 0.01 0.2 0.1 to 0.8 0.02

*Urgent: Requested within 24 h.

†Reference in the logistic regression model.

‡Working hours: 7:00–16:00.