Skip to main content
. 2004 Aug;42(8):3607–3612. doi: 10.1128/JCM.42.8.3607-3612.2004

TABLE 2.

Interpretive agreement between results of fluconazole disk diffusion tests and standard 48-h BMDa

Organism (no. tested) Test methodd % of results in each categoryb
% Agreementc % errors
S SDD R VME ME M
C. albicans (1,631) Ref.-MIC 99.8 0.2 0.0
Ref.-disk 99.5 0.4 0.1 99.6 0.0 0.1 0.3
Part.-disk 97.6 0.7 1.7 97.7 0.0 1.4 0.9
C. glabrata (403) Ref.-MIC 69.5 26.3 4.2
Ref.-disk 93.6 2.2 4.2 71.7 0.8 0.5 27.0
Part.-disk 71.5 14.4 14.1 60.6 0.7 7.4 31.3
C. parapsilosis (400) Ref.-MIC 93.3 6.2 0.5
Ref.-disk 91.0 3.0 6.0 93.3 0.0 1.0 5.7
Part.-disk 85.5 4.0 10.5 85.5 0.0 4.8 9.7
C. tropicalis (327) Ref.-MIC 99.1 0.3 0.6
Ref.-disk 98.8 0.6 0.6 97.9 0.6 0.6 0.9
Part.-disk 89.6 7.0 3.4 88.7 0.6 3.4 7.3
All Candida spp. (2,949) Ref.-MIC 91.6 6.7 1.7
Ref.-disk 94.1 2.2 3.7 92.8 0.2 0.4 6.6
Part.-disk 87.9 4.5 7.6 87.4 0.2 3.3 9.1
a

Fluconazole disk diffusion testing was performed according to NCCLS method M44-A, and fluconazole BMD MIC testing was performed according to NCCLS method M27-A2.

b

Fluconazole susceptibility categories: S, susceptible, MIC of ≤8 μg/ml (≥19 mm); SDD, susceptible dose dependent, MIC of 16 to 32 μg/ml (15 to 18 mm); R, resistant, MIC of ≥64 μg/ml (≤14 mm).

c

Percent categorical agreement between disk diffusion and MIC test results.

d

Ref.-MIC, MIC testing performed by ARTEMIS reference laboratory; Ref.-disk, disk testing performed by ARTEMIS reference laboratory; Part.-disk, disk testing performed by ARTEMIS participants.