Table 3.

Cross-trait LD score regression between EOC subtypes

	HG serous	Endometrioid	Endometrioid G1/G2	Endometrioid G3	Clear Cell	Unknown
HG serous	–	0.82 (0.49) P = 0.095	0.35 (0.41) P = 0.41	1.0 (1.17) P = 0.20	–	0.46 (0.46) P = 0.31
Endometrioid	0.67 (0.25) P = 0.0074	–	–	–	–	1.0 (0.41) P = 0.01
Endometrioid G1/G2	0.35 (0.25) P = 0.15	–	–	0.49 (0.70) P = 0.47*	–	0.85 (0.40) P = 0.035
Endometrioid G3	1.0 (0.79) P = 0.15	–	0.53 (0.67) P = 0.48*	–	–	1.0 (0.73) P = 0.15
Clear Cell	0.53 (0.57) P = 0.35	0.91 (0.80) P = 0.26	0.71 (0.59) P = 0.23	1.00 (1.06) P = 0.29	–	–
Unknown	0.63 (0.25) P = 1.3E–02	1.0 (0.30) P = 5.7E–04	0.77 (0.33) P = 0.02	1.00 (0.79) P = 0.14	0.38 (0.53) P = 0.47	–

Estimates and (standard errors) are reported. Analyses for mucinous and low-grade serous EOC subtypes were underpowered to yield reliable estimates

Bolded estimates are significantly different from 0