Skip to main content
. 2016 Jun 6;5:e24. doi: 10.1017/jns.2016.11

Table 2.

Summary of the quality rating and the significant results for the thirteen studies

Reference Results Quality score Level of significance Measure*
Balisteiro et al. (2013)(10) Aracà juice reduced pGR and tGR-AUC v. control Positive P < 0·05 GR
Bryans et al. (2007)(15) (1) Tea reduced 120 min GR v. control and caffeine
(2) Tea increased 90 min IR v. control and caffeine
(3) Tea increased 150 min IR v. caffeine
(4) Tea reduced 30† and 120 min‡ IR v. caffeine
Positive (1) P < 0·01
(2) P < 0·01
(3) P < 0·05
(4) P < 0·01†, P < 0·05‡
Both
Clegg et al. (2011)(11) No difference Neutral P < 0·05 GR
Coe et al. (2013)(12) 37 g baobab fruit reduced 60 and 120 min GR-AUC v. control
18·5 g baobab fruit reduced 120 and 180 min GR-AUC v. control
Positive P < 0·05 GR
Gruendel et al. (2007)(16) 5 and 10 g carob increased total GR v. control
5 and 10 g carob increased total IR v. control
Neutral P < 0·001 Both
Johnston et al. (2002)(17) (1) Clear apple juice reduced 15† and 30 min‡ GR v. control
(2) Cloudy apple juice reduced 15 min GR v. control
(3) Cloudy apple juice increased 45† and 60 min‡ GR v. control
(4) Clear† and cloudy‡ juice reduced GR-AUC 0–30 min v. control
(5) Cloudy reduced GR-AUC 30–90 min v. control
(6) Clear and cloudy juice reduced IR-AUC 0–90 min v. control
Positive (1) P < 0·0001†, P < 0·05‡
(2) P < 0·001
(3) P < 0·05†, P < 0·005‡
(4) P < 0·01†, P < 0·005‡
(5) P < 0·01
(6) P < 0·05
Both
Johnston et al. (2003)(18) Caffeine coffee increased 0–30 min GR-AUC v. non-caffeine and control
Caffeine coffee increased 0–30 min IR-AUC v. non-caffeine
Positive P < 0·05 Both
Ochiai et al. (2014)(19) No difference Neutral P < 0·05 Both
Rosén et al. (2011)(13) Amilo reduced IR-AUC 0–60 min v. control, Dankowskie Zlote and Nikita
Amilo and Rekrut reduced IR 60–120 min v. control and Haute Loire
Rekrut reduced IR 120–180 min v. Haute Loire
Amilo reduced pIR v. all rye breads except Rekrut
Rekrut reduced GR-AUC 60–120 min v. control
Correlation between total polyphenols and GR 0–60 min
Positive P < 0·05 Both
Törrönen et al. (2010)(20) (1) Berries reduced 15† and 30 min‡ GR v. control
(2) Berries increased 150 min GR v. control
(3) Berries reduced pGR v. control
Neutral (1) P < 0·05†, P < 0·01‡
(2) P < 0·05
(3) P = 0·002
GR
Törrönen et al. (2012)(21) Purée
(1) Berries reduced GR 15 min v. control
(2) Blackcurrants reduced GR 30 min v. control
(3) Berries increased GR 60 and 90 min v. control
(4) Lingonberries reduced GR 120 min v. control
(5) Blackcurrants reduced pGR v. control
(6) Berries increased GP v. control
(7) Berries reduced IR 15 min v. control
(8) Blackcurrants† and lingonberries‡ reduced IR 30 min v. control
(9) Blackcurrants† and lingonberries‡ increased IR 60 min v. control
(10) Berries increased IR 90 min v. control
(11) Blackcurrants† and lingonberries‡ increased IR120 min v. control
(12) Blackcurrants† and lingonberries‡ reduced pIR v. control
(13) Blackcurrants† and lingonberries‡ increased IR-AUC v. control
Nectars
(1) Blackcurrants reduced GR 0–45 min v. control
(2) Blackcurrants increased GR 90 min v. control
(3) Blackcurrants reduced pGR v. control
Neutral Purée
(1) P < 0·01
(2) P < 0·05
(3) P < 0·001
(4) P < 0·001
(5) P = 0·022
(6) P < 0·001
(7) P < 0·001
(8) P < 0·001†, P < 0·05‡
(9) P < 0·001†, P < 0·01‡
(10) P < 0·001
(11) P < 0·05†, P < 0·001‡
(12) P = 0·052†, P = 0·03‡
(13) P = 0·002†, P = 0·004‡
Nectars
(1) P < 0·05
(2) P < 0·05
(3) P < 0·001
Both
(4) Blackcurrants reduced GR-AUC control
(5) Lingonberries increased GR 60–120 min v. control
(6) Berries increased GP v. control
(7) Blackcurrants reduced IR 30 min v. control
(8) Blackcurrants increased IR 60 and 90 min v. control
(9) Lingonberries increased IR 90 min v. control
(10) Blackcurrants† and lingonberries‡ increased IR-AUC v. control
(4) P = 0·03
(5) P < 0·05
(6) P < 0·001
(7) P < 0·05
(8) P < 0·01
(9) P < 0·001
(10) P = 0·03†, P = 0·036‡
Törrönen et al. (2012)(22) (1) Berries reduced capillary† and venous‡ GR 15 min v. control
(2) Berries reduced IR 15 min v. control
(3) Berries increased capillary† and venous‡ GR 90 min control
(4) Berries reduced peak capillary† and venous‡ GR
(5) Berries reduced pIR
(6) Berries improved capillary† and venous‡ GP v. control
(7) Berries increased IR 120 min v. control
Neutral (1) P = 0·021†, P < 0·007‡
(2) P = 0·028
(3) P = 0·028†, P = 0·021
(4) P < 0·009†, P < 0·011‡
(5) P < 0·005
(6) P < 0·001†, P = 0·003‡
(7) P = 0·042
Both
Törrönen et al. (2013)(14) (1) Strawberries reduced pIR v. wheat control
(2) Strawberries reduced IR-AUC 0–60 min v. wheat control
(3) Strawberries increased GP v. wheat control
(4) Bilberries and lingonberries reduced IR-AUC 0–60 v. wheat control
(5) Bilberries and lingonberries reduced IR-AUC 0–30 min v. wheat control
(6) Chokeberries reduced IR-AUC 0–60 v. wheat control
(7) Chokeberries reduced IR-AUC 0–30 min v. wheat control
(8) Berry mix reduced GR-AUC 0–30 min v. wheat control
(9) Berry mix increased GP v. wheat control
(10) Berry mix reduced IR 15 and 30 min v. wheat control
(11) Berry mix increased IR 120 min v. wheat control
(12) Berry mix reduced pIR v. wheat control
(13) Berry mix reduced IR-AUC 0–120†, 0–60‡ and 0–30 min‡ v. wheat control
(14) Berry mix reduced GR-AUC 0–30 min v. rye control
(15) Berry mix increased GP v. rye control
(16) Berry mix reduced IR 15 and 30 min v. rye control
(17) Berry mix increased 120 min v. rye control
(18) Berry mix reduced pIR v. rye control
(19) Berry mix reduced IR-AUC 0–120†, 0–60‡ and 0–30 min‡ v. rye control
Neutral (1) P < 0·05
(2) P < 0·01
(3) P < 0·05
(4) P < 0·05
(5) P < 0·01
(6) P < 0·05
(7) P < 0·001
(8) P < 0·001
(9) P = 0·005
(10) P < 0·05
(11) P < 0·05
(12) P = 0·001
(13) P = 0·041†, P < 0·001‡
(14) P = 0·026
(15) P = 0·05
(16) P < 0·05
(17) P < 0·05
(18) P < 0·001
(19) P = 0·03†, P < 0·001‡
Both

pGR, peak glycaemic response; tGR, total glycaemic response; GR, glycaemic response; IR, insulin response; pIR, peak insulin response; GP, glycaemic profile.

* If the GR and the IR were measured in the study, the word ‘both’ is given in the ‘measures’ column.