Skip to main content
. 2016 Jul 19;5:e30. doi: 10.1017/jns.2016.18

Table 5.

Randomised clinical trial results reporting the effect of soya isoflavone interventions and equol producer (EP) status on inflammation and DNA damage parameters*

First author, year CHD risk factor measured Effect of isoflavone on CHD risk factors Result marker Effect of EP status on CHD risk factors Result marker‡
Acharjee et al. (2015)(27) CRP, sICAM-1 Reduction in CRP in women with and without MetS (11·8 %, P = 0·04 and 30 %, P = 0·01, respectively) after the soya intervention compared with placebo. In women with MetS, reduction in sICAM-1 (5·2 %, P = 0·04) compared with placebo, unlike in women without MetS + Reduced CRP (21·4 %; P = 0·01) and sICAM-1 (7·3 %, P = 0·03) in EP with MetS compared with placebo after the soya intervention. Reduced CRP (30 %; P = 0·04) in EP without MetS compared with placebo. There were NS effects on NEP with or without MetS in any of these variables +
Clerici et al. (2007)(56) hsCRP Reduction in hsCRP (2·2 (sem 0·9) mg/l, P = 0·03) after the soya intervention compared with placebo + After the soya intervention, hsCRP decreased 0·9 (sem 0·5) mg/l more in EP than NEP (P = 0·025) +
Pusparini & Hidayat (2015)(45) MDA Reduction in MDA after the soya intervention (P = 0·021) + After the soya intervention, EP had a greater decline in MDA than NEP +
Törmälä et al. (2008)(50) P-selectin P-selectin decreased by 10·3 % (P = 0·002) after the soya intervention compared with placebo + EP had a greater decline in P-selectin (13·5 %; P = 0·007) than NEP (7·7 %; NS) after the soya intervention +
Mangano et al. (2013)(42) IL-6 The percentage change of IL-6 declined from baseline after the soya intervention compared with placebo (P = 0·007) + EP status had a NS effect on percentage change of IL-6 after the soya intervention 0
Qin et al. (2014)(62) Uric acid Reductions in the low and high daidzein isoflavone interventions compared with placebo in uric acid (−23 (sd 47) and −29 (sd 0·44) µmol/l, respectively; P < 0·05) + EP status had a NS effect on uric acid after the isoflavone intervention 0
Greany et al. (2008)(33) Hcy, CRP, E-selectin, VCAM-1, ICAM-1 The soya intervention had a NS effect on the risk factors compared with placebo 0 EP status had a NS effect on the risk factors after the soya intervention 0
Hall et al. (2005)(34) MCP-1, CRP, VCAM-1, ICAM-1, E-selectin The isoflavone intervention had a NS effect on the risk factors compared with placebo 0 EP status had a NS effect on the risk factors after the isoflavone intervention 0
Mangano et al. (2013)(42) hsCRP The soya intervention had a NS effect on hsCRP compared with placebo 0 EP status had a NS effect on hsCRP after the soya intervention 0
McVeigh et al. (2006)(67) CRP The soya intervention had a NS effect on CRP compared with placebo 0 NS interaction with EP status and the soya intervention with CRP 0
Pop et al. (2008)(44) Neutrophil count, DNA damage markers (AP-site assay, comet assay), apoptosis markers (TUNEL assay, caspase-3 activation) The isoflavone intervention had a NS effect on the risk factors compared with placebo 0 EP status had a NS effect on the risk factors after the isoflavone intervention. Activated caspase-3 was higher in treated EP on day 1 but decreased through day 84, while it increased in NEP in this time period 0
Pusparini & Hidayat (2015)(45) VCAM-1 The soya intervention had a NS effect on VCAM-1 compared with placebo 0 EP status had a NS effect on VCAM-1 after the soya intervention 0
Reimann et al. (2006)(46) Hcy, ADMA The isoflavone intervention had a NS effect on the risk factors compared with placebo 0 EP status had a NS effect on the risk factors after the isoflavone intervention 0
Reverri et al. (2015)(63) CRP, TNF, IL-6, IL-18, IL-10 The soya intervention had a NS effect on the risk factors compared with placebo 0 EP status had a NS effect on the risk factors after the soya intervention 0
Steinberg et al. (2003)(48) VCAM-1, ICAM-1, E-selectin The soya intervention had a NS effect on the risk factors 0 EP status had a NS effect on the risk factors after the soya intervention 0
Törmälä et al. (2008)(50) CRP, ICAM-1, VCAM-1 The soya intervention had a NS effect on the risk factors compared with placebo. There was a NS increase in VCAM-1 after the soya intervention compared with placebo (9·2 %; P = 0·06) 0 EP status had a NS effect on the risk factors after the soya intervention 0
West et al. (2005)(65) VCAM-1, P-selectin The soya intervention had a NS effect on the risk factors compared with placebo 0 EP status had a NS effect on the risk factors after the soya intervention 0
Wong et al. (2012)(66) CRP The soya interventions had a NS effect on CRP compared with placebo 0 EP status had a NS effect on CRP after the soya interventions 0

CRP, C-reactive protein; sICAM-1, soluble intercellular adhesion molecule-1; MetS, metabolic syndrome; NEP, non-equol producer; hsCRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; MDA, malondialdehyde; P-selectin, platelet selectin; Hcy, homocysteine; E-selectin, endothelial selectin; VCAM-1, vascular cell adhesion molecule 1; ICAM-1, intracellular adhesion molecule-1; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1; AP-site, apurinic/apyrimidinic site; TUNEL, terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labelling; ADMA, asymmetric dimethylarginine.

*

Results are first stratified by the impact of EP status and then the impact of the soya isoflavone interventions on each of the lipid risk factors.

+, Beneficial effect of soya isoflavones on risk factors of CHD; 0, negligible effect of soya isoflavones on risk factors of CHD; –, adverse effect of soya isoflavones on risk factors of CHD.

+, Beneficial effect of EP status on risk factors of CHD after soya intervention; 0, negligible effect of EP status on CHD risk factors after soya intervention; –, adverse effect of EP status on risk factors of CHD after soya intervention.