Table 2.
Item | Domain | Item difficultyb | Item uncertaintyc | Index of discriminationd | Item-total correlatione | α if item deletedf | Test-retest reliabilityg |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Attributable risk, smoking | 20.8% | 50.8% | 23.4% | 0.12 | 0.70 | 0.29 |
|
Risk factors, smoking | 84.2% | 10.8% | 40.0% | 0.23 | 0.69 | 0.33 |
|
Risk reduction, smoking | 88.3% | 2.5% | 7.4% | -0.01 | 0.71 | 0.13 |
|
Risk, cause of death | 25.8% | 45.0% | 53.1% | 0.30 | 0.68 | 0.41 |
|
Screening eligibility | 47.5% | 41.7% | 52.6% | 0.25 | 0.69 | 0.44 |
|
Screening eligibility | 2.5% | 5.8% | 2.9% | 0.10 | 0.69 | 0.66 |
|
Predictive value of screening | 2.5% | 66.7% | 2.9% | 0.07 | 0.70 | 0.38 |
|
Predictive value of screening | 63.3% | 35.0% | 75.4% | 0.49 | 0.65 | 0.41 |
|
Screening accuracy, false positives | 37.5% | 50.8% | 67.4% | 0.40 | 0.66 | 0.36 |
|
Screening accuracy, false negatives | 52.5% | 37.5% | 68.0% | 0.38 | 0.67 | 0.49 |
|
Natural history, “over-diagnosis” | 57.5% | 30.0% | 83.4% | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.45 |
|
Screening benefit, mortality | 72.5% | 24.2% | 52.6% | 0.32 | 0.68 | 0.22 |
|
Screening benefit, mortality reduction | 1.7% | 59.2% | -1.1% | 0.00 | 0.70 | 0.20 |
|
Screening, secondary findings | 70.0% | 29.2% | 77.1% | 0.52 | 0.65 | 0.57 |
|
Screening, secondary findings | 44.2% | 50.0% | 64.0% | 0.29 | 0.68 | 0.28 |
|
Screening risks | 29.2% | 42.5% | 56.0% | 0.33 | 0.67 | 0.39 |
Bolded items were included in the final lung cancer screening knowledge measure.
Abbreviations: CT = Computed tomography, α = alpha. All data were collected from 12/2014 to 09/2015 in Houston, TX.
Items were dropped from final lung cancer screening knowledge measure.
Item difficulty is the percentage correct responses.
Item uncertainty is the percentage of “I don't know” responses.
The index of discrimination is the difference between percentage of respondents with correct responses for an item among those who scored in the upper versus lower quartiles of correct responses to the full scale. Items with an index of discrimination greater than 40% are considered acceptable for discrimination, and those with an index less than 20% are considered inadequate.
Item-Total Correlation is the correlation between the response on an individual question and the overall score on the survey.
α if item deleted represents the internal consistency of the scale without that item.
Kappa coefficients are reported for baseline and 1-month, and represent average intercorrelation of items with dichotomous responses.