Table 2.
Relevant Statistics for Prospective and Retrospective Memory Errorsa
| Fb | CIs | p-value | η2pc | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prospective Memory Errors | ||||
| CDR Status | 45.8 | 0.35, 0.65 | <.01 | .43 |
| Encoding Condition | 11.1 | 0.10, 0.40 | <.01 | .15 |
| Task Type | 2.5 | −0.11, 0.01 | .12 | .04 |
| Cue | 1.4 | −0.08, 0.02 | .25 | .02 |
| Age | 1.2 | .27 | .02 | |
| CDR X Task Type | 7.8 | < .01 | .11 | |
| CDR X Encoding condition | 1.1 | .30 | .02 | |
| Retrospective Memory Errors | ||||
| CDR Status | 27.0 | 0.18, 0.41 | < .01 | .30 |
| Encoding Condition | 0.6 | −0.07, 0.16 | .46 | .01 |
| Age | 5.9 | .02 | .09 | |
| CDR X Encoding Condition | 0.1 | .79 | <.01 | |
The statistical tests were derived from ANCOVAs, with age as the covariate.
The degrees of freedom were 1 in the numerator and 62 in the denominator for all F values listed in the table.
η2p = partial eta squared, an index of effect size.