Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Jun 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016 Jun;64(6):1307–1312. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14134

Table 2.

Relevant Statistics for Prospective and Retrospective Memory Errorsa

Fb CIs p-value η2pc
Prospective Memory Errors
 CDR Status 45.8 0.35, 0.65 <.01 .43
 Encoding Condition 11.1 0.10, 0.40 <.01 .15
 Task Type 2.5 −0.11, 0.01 .12 .04
 Cue 1.4 −0.08, 0.02 .25 .02
 Age 1.2 .27 .02
 CDR X Task Type 7.8 < .01 .11
 CDR X Encoding condition 1.1 .30 .02
Retrospective Memory Errors
 CDR Status 27.0 0.18, 0.41 < .01 .30
 Encoding Condition 0.6 −0.07, 0.16 .46 .01
 Age 5.9 .02 .09
 CDR X Encoding Condition 0.1 .79 <.01
a

The statistical tests were derived from ANCOVAs, with age as the covariate.

b

The degrees of freedom were 1 in the numerator and 62 in the denominator for all F values listed in the table.

c

η2p = partial eta squared, an index of effect size.