Table 8. Comparison of recognition effect between dynamic supervised and unsupervised CEERM based on different feature layers.
Model+Abstract Layers | R | P | F | FI | FIR(%) | FCI | FCIR(%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DBN4+POSL | 75.11 | 78.21 | 76.63 | 0 | 0 | 4.89 | 6.38 |
DBN4+POSL+DPL | 79.13 | 80.35 | 79.74 | 3.11 | 4.05 | 2.38 | 2.98 |
DBN4+POSL+DPL+LENL | 83.21 | 80.81 | 81.99 | 2.26 | 2.83 | 1.47 | 1.79 |
DBN4+POSL+DPL+LENL+LOCL | 87.32 | 78.61 | 82.74 | 0.74 | 0.91 | 1.7 | 2.05 |
DBN4+POSL+DPL+LENL+LOCL+DISL | 91.76 | 80.28 | 85.64 | 2.9 | 3.51 | 2.59 | 3.02 |
DBN4+POSL+DPL+LENL+LOCL+DISL+TWFL | 90.32 | 86 | 88.11 | 2.47 | 2.88 | 2.94 | 3.34 |
Note: See the note to Table 7.