EXHIBIT 3.
Comparison of Regular Users of the New Supermarket versus Others in the Intervention Neighborhood (Hill District)
Outcome |
New Supermarket Users |
New Supermarket Non-Users |
Significance Level |
||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=368) |
Change+ Mean (n=368) |
Baseline (n=171) |
Change+ Mean (n=171) |
||
Dietary quality (Healthy Eating Index-2010) | 48.84 | −0.45 | 48.16 | −0.20 | |
Mean daily intakes | |||||
Total kilocalories | 1759.15 | −260 | 1644.48 | −201 | |
Total fat as a percentage of total kilocalories (%) | 72.33 | 0.00 | 66.66 | 1.08 | |
Added sugars in teaspoons | 14.76 | −3.17 | 13.05 | −2.37 | |
Solid fats, alcohol and added sugars (SoFAAS) as a percentage of total kilocalories (%) |
33.77 | −1.63 | 32.20 | −2.04 | |
Fruits and vegetables in servings | 2.27 | −0.32 | 2.26 | −0.11 | |
Whole grains in ounces | 0.62 | −0.06 | 0.65 | −0.09 | |
Body Mass Index | 30.34 | 0.01 | 30.44 | 0.16 | |
Overweight or obese (%) | 77.69 | −0.28 | 76.22 | 0.73 | |
Obese (%) | 46.95 | −1.96 | 48.81 | −2.98 | |
Neighborhood satisfaction (%) | 69.42 | 13.86 | 66.35 | 5.14 | |
Perceived access to healthy foods (%) | |||||
F&V easily accessible | 17.43 | 59.8 | 14.83 | 48.5 | * |
F&V choice | 12.80 | 59.4 | 5.85 | 48.7 | * |
F&V quality | 17.75 | 47.1 | 12.17 | 41.2 | |
F&V cost | 17.14 | 34.8 | 17.03 | 18.9 | ** |
WGP easily accessible | 18.47 | 57.8 | 16.23 | 47.0 | * |
WGP choice | 13.72 | 50.7 | 8.79 | 43.7 | |
WGP cost | 16.30 | 42.1 | 14.96 | 27.5 | ** |
LFP easily accessible | 16.17 | 63.0 | 16.93 | 44.7 | ** |
LFP choice | 12.62 | 54.5 | 13.12 | 38.2 | ** |
LFP cost | 13.71 | 43.4 | 15.77 | 28.4 | ** |
source Authors’ calculations.
notes * p <0.05;
p < 0.01;
p < 0.001;
Change is computed as difference between follow up and baseline; the results on nutrient levels and types of foods describe mean reported daily intakes;
F&V = fruits and vegetables, WGP = whole grain products, and LFP = low-fat products.