Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Aug 8.
Published in final edited form as: J Urol. 2016 Feb 28;195(4 Pt 2):1232–1238. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.09.091

Table 2. Factors associated with teacher promotion of LUT health.

Teachers Promote LUT Health Rate Univariate p Value Adjusted OR (95% CI) Multivariate p Value
Grade taught:
 Kindergarten 0.38 <0.001 Referent <0.001
 1 0.27 0.80 (0.76–0.84)
 2 0.21
 3 0.21
 4 0.14
 5 0.16
School type:
 Public 0.23 0.363 Referent 0.31
 Nonpublic 0.24 1.11 (0.90–1.11)
Teaching yrs:
 5 or Less 0.19 <0.001 Referent <0.001
 Greater than 5 0.26 1.66 (1.39–1.98)
No. teachers/classroom:
 1 0.23 0.007 0.91 (0.74–1.11) 0.35
 Greater than 1 0.28
LUT health professional development/training:
 No 0.23 <0.001 Referent <0.001
 Yes 0.29 1.42 (1.18–1.70)
Frequency of witnessing urinary incontinence:
 Less than 1/6 mos 0.21 <0.001 Referent 0.35
 Greater than 1/6 mos 0.31 1.09 (0.91–1.30)
LUT health is health issue + not teacher issue:
 Disagree 0.24 <0.001 Referent <0.001
 Agree 0.19 0.70 (0.59–0.85)